Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 August 20

August 20
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 20, 2009

Al Qaida faciliator
The result of the discussion was Delete all. Killiondude (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * → Al Qaida (links to redirect)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida
 * → Al Qaida Geo Swan (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. When a reader clicks on a bluelink that is a redirect, he should be taken to an article that contains information about the subject. In a case where the phrase "al Qaida facilitator" is wikilinked (e.g. ), the best course of action is not to create a redirect for that title, but rather to edit the page to remove or modify the link (e.g.  ). And, for what it's worth, I think that Geo Swan is correct to believe that many readers would indeed be annoyed at being forced to wait for a 80KB page to load only to discover that the page contains no information about their desired topic. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 19:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I started a discussion about what I think would be required to turn the red-links into useful links, at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Terrorism . Please, don't collapse the red-links to simple links to Taliban, or al Qaida.  Thanks!  Geo Swan (talk) 23:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all plus all involving spelling variants of 'Al Qaida' such as Al Qaeda member. The name of the organization is the search term, period. The rest is overkill (my apologies - I don't think 'redundant' is the right word). B.Wind (talk) 02:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

JamesNintendoNerd
The result of the discussion was Keep. Killiondude (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC) At no point was AVGN ever referred to by this title. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → The Angry Video Game Nerd (links to redirect)
 * Keep. Per my argument above. —  Σ  xplicit 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep You're wrong, he is referred to by this IF you're talking about his YouTube username. Your argument for deleting this is weak. 194.144.87.74 (talk) 00:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Falun_Gong/Archive2



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedily deleted CSD G6 by User:Killiondude (non-admin close). B.Wind (talk) 01:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Move to delete unused redirects of no relevance to articles' current or anticipated structure and content. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Falun Gong‎ (links to redirect)