Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 December 3

December 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 3, 2009

The Great Unknown (D&D)
The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 05:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * → Faction (Planescape) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

No mention in target article. Searches on Google seem to be sparse references to the afterlife in general. Unlikely anyone will tack on "(D&D)" to a search, even if The Great Unknown is a part of Dungeons & Dragons. — The Man in Question (gesprec)  ·  (forðung)  23:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - that smelt funny to me, so it turns out that The Great Unknown is a dab page, and The Great Unknown (D&D) wasn't on it. It is now.  Problem solved. Josh Parris 12:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as redirect, although a page move to The Great Unknown (Dungeons & Dragons) or perhaps better yet The Great Unknown (Planescape) might be in order. The subject is mentioned on the target page now. BOZ (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, not much point performing a page move as that will create a double redirect anyway. Keep, with no prejudice to also creating redirects at other possible usages. --Taelus (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether
The result of the discussion was Keep as no longer a redirect Josh Parris 23:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * → Epoxy putty (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Please delete: the target article contains almost no information on bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), and epoxy putty is by far not the only product that this substance is used in (there are many more types of epoxy resins) so useful information on BADGE should not reside in the article on epoxy putty). Pbech (talk) 18:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC) The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
 * Speedy keep has been turned into an article addressing these concerns. Josh Parris 20:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

President’s Council of Scientific and Technical Advisors



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted under CSD G7, author requested deletion. --Taelus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * → United States President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Probably should be deleted according to Reasons for Deletion no. 7 (obscurity): after correcting a reference in Ralph E. Gomory, it seems to appear in only one external source: http://sippi.aaas.org/ipissues/updates/?res_id=575 (Note that the redirect is not consistent with the acronym of the target, PCAST.) Airsplit (talk) 07:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, no access history, no links, and an imprecise title. I might be misreading the history, but didn't you create this an hour ago?  If so, surely db-author could be used? Josh Parris 08:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct. db-author added to page. Airsplit (talk) 10:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)