Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 March 8

Chicken Supreme → Chicken Kiev
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Supreme (cookery). Ruslik (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

target is not synonymous, suggest delete or redirect to chicken Petecarney (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement like, suggesting that Chicken Kiev is supreme. Also no evidence that they are the same thing Lets  drink  Tea  20:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep a Google search of "Chicken Supreme" + Kiev yields 1500 hits, including several that explain that "Chicken Supreme" was the original name of the dish that is now more commonly known as Chicken Kiev,, for example. B.Wind (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per B.Wind  §hawn poo   23:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, Chicken Supreme is favoured by many restaurants I know. This is a dish name. No suggestion of actual supremacy.--ZayZayEM (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Retarget to chicken; Chicken Kiev is not the only meaning of "Chicken supreme"; to me its primary meaning is simply "chicken breast". Certainly I see plenty of chicken supreme links that don't appear to have anything to do with chicken with butter in the centre, particularly . --Rogerb67 (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment, The Google statistics quoted above are not relevant. Any web page mentioning both Chicken Supreme and Chicken Kiev, as does this page, would appear in that 1500 total. The site mentioned does not meet WP:VR requirements. The source of the confusion is surely the fact that the French for Chicken Kiev is "des suprêmes de poulet à la Kiev" which translates as "fillets of chicken in the Kiev style". So Rogerb67 is right that the meaning is simply "chicken breast". Googling "des suprêmes de poulet" reveals many other "à la" variations which are not Chicken Kiev. I can also find many recipies entitled Chicken Supreme which include a creamy sauce, which is the primary meaning to me. Either way, nothing to do with chicken with butter in the centre. Petecarney (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Chicken Supreme" certainly has many other meanings than Chicken Kiev - a redirect to chicken is probably the best, unless someone wants to write a disambiguation page with all the different recipes. — sjorford++ 15:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Chicken Supreme and Chicken Kiev are two totally different dishes, if my childhood memories serve me well. The first is chicken in a creamy sauce, the second is chicken breast wrapped around garlic butter and coated in breadcrumbs. If Sir Jamie says so then it must be so. pushthebutton  &#x007C;  go on...  &#x007C;  push it!  19:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Supreme (cookery) which describes this dish. TerriersFan (talk) 20:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Asal The Original → Asal
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Declined speedy nomination. Reason was, "there is no need for this redirect page at all. This is not the title of the subject." SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete I looked this up on Google and there is no significant evidence that this is an alternate name for the film. Lets  drink  Tea  20:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedily delete. I previously tagged this article for deletion. Why was it declined? This title has nothing to do with what it redirects to. Asal is the original name of the movie and "Asal The Original" was made by another author for some unknown reason, which happens to be the exact same content as in Asal. For that reason I tagged the article for a speedy deletion. --Eelam StyleZ (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Gyeongdong Pharmaceuticals → Pharmaceutical drug
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Just... why? ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 13:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete 'Nuff said. Lets  drink  Tea  19:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Ustase/Archive 3 → Ustaše
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 

Improper redirect, should not have /  MBisanz  talk 04:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Not a talk page, articles do not need archives Lets  drink  Tea  17:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives.  §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Pokemon/Archive 2 → Pokémon
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 

Improper redirect, should not have /  MBisanz  talk 04:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Not a talk page, articles do not need archives Lets  drink  Tea  17:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives.  §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Pokemon/Archive 1 → Pokémon
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 

Improper redirect, should not have /  MBisanz  talk 04:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Not a talk page, articles do not need archives Lets  drink  Tea  17:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives.  §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Nguyen Ngoc Loan/Archive1 → Nguyễn Ngọc Loan
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 

Inappropriate redirect, no need for /  MBisanz  talk 04:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Not a talk page, articles do not need archives Lets  drink  Tea  17:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives.  §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

HTML/Archive 1 → HTML
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC) <span id="HTML/Archive 1" >

Improper redirect with a / in the title.  MBisanz  talk 04:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Not a talk page, articles do not need archives Lets  drink  Tea  17:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives. <span style="padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;"> §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

V-J day in Times Square/Archive1 → V–J day in Times Square
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC) <span id="V-J day in Times Square/Archive1" >

Improper redirect, should not have / in title.  MBisanz  talk 04:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Articles do not get archived Lets  drink  Tea  17:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives. <span style="padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;"> §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Fucking Amal/Archive 1 → Show Me Love (film)
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC) <span id="Fucking Amal/Archive 1" >

Improperly titled redirect, unlikely typo.  MBisanz  talk 04:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy Delete What the hell is this anyways? Lets  drink  Tea  17:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles do not need archives. <span style="padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;"> §hawn poo   23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)