Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 11

May 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2009

Israeli art students
The result of the discussion was Deleted and salted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Delete and salt. Continually redirected to a 9/11 incident which, in fact, isn't called by that name. The 9/11 section conflates two or three alleged or suspected incidents by Israeli artists or art students. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * → Culture of Israel

Delete Its a Hell of a lot more then "two or three incidents," however (more like hundreds, as can be discerned here: http://www.antiwar.com/israeli-files.php). But that will be addressed when I write the relevant article. In the meantime, this useless redirect should be done away with. Oh, and it should be noted that this redirect page was originally created as a redirect to Culture of Israel, presumably in order to direct people from what they were actually looking for (as I find it simply implausible that any person of reasonable intelligence could possibly have thought they were being helpful when they created such a redirect; why would a person looking for Culture of Israel search with the phrase "Israeli art students?"). KevinOKeeffe (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Phrenectomy
The result of the discussion was retarget to Phrenic nerve. –Black Falcon (Talk) 22:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

A phrenectomy is the surgical removal of the phrenic nerve, which is not related to a frenectomy.Jasonbholden (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * → Frenectomy
 * Delete, due to spelling error. blurredpeace ☮ 19:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Change redirect to Phrenic nerve. I've added the word to the existing text about it in that article.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to phrenic nerve per Fabrictramp.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Azala
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Completing this nomination for User:Janke, who appears to have had trouble with the procedure. As seen here, his reason appears to be "redirect pointed to wrong article". I have contacted Janke with a pointer here to leave any further comments that he wishes to make. My own opinion on this redirect appears below. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * → History_of_cartography

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. "Azala" is mentioned at the target as the owner of a plot of land described on what is probably the oldest map still in existence, which makes this a reasonable redirect. Although there are a few other things named Azala, this is the most important usage. Moreover, if the target is disputed, that's not a reason for deletion. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing nom, comment: I have goofed... The reason I nominated is that I somehow found myself at what appeared to be an Azala language wikipedia ( via "check usage" on Commons images), then looked for "Azala" on enwiki, and got redirected to ancient history and a single reference to "a person called Azala"... Looking into this, i now see that it is the "Euskara" language wiki that confused me. Sorry, I withdraw the nom, and have restored the redirect. But maybe we should have an article named "Azala"? ;-) --Janke | Talk 07:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Glueless connection
The result of the discussion was delete. –Black Falcon (Talk) 22:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete this misleading redirect. As far as I know the term "glueless connection" is completely unrelated to wireless networking (and isn't mentioned on the target page). Tobias Bergemann (talk) 06:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Wireless network
 * Delete, I agree that glueless connections don't have anything to do with wireless networks. MichaK (talk) 19:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)