Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 September 24

September 24
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 24, 2009

Six Flags Over Illinois
The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 14:46, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Six Flags Great America (links to redirect)

Not a helpful redirect as Six Flags Great America was never known as Six Flags Over Illinois. Tavix | Talk  23:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - Six Flags Great America is located in Gurnee, Illinois, just north of Chicago. It likely that someone would remember that it's in that U.S. State and would think that the name of the place is similar to Six Flags Over Texas and Six Flags Over Georgia. It's not a correct name, but a likely search item nonetheless. B.Wind (talk) 01:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep plausible searching error.    DGG ( talk ) 23:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Templatetalkheader
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 08:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Template:Talkheader (links to redirect)

Same case with Categorytalkheader. Unnecessary. Created as a copy of talkheader and then redirected. Magioladitis (talk) 18:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as unnecessary. The history also seems like it can be deleted, but if it needs to be retained the page can be moved to a subpage of Template:Talkheader. —Zach425 talk / contribs 04:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Categorytalkheader
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 07:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Template:Talkheader (links to redirect)

Unnecessary. Created as a copy of talkheader and then redirected. Magioladitis (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as unnecessary. The history also seems like it can be deleted, but if it needs to be retained the page can be moved to a subpage of Template:Talkheader. —Zach425 talk / contribs 04:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Talkpagelong
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Template:Talkheader (links to redirect)

Another unnecessary redirect of Talkheader. We have talkpage. Magioladitis (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as unnecessary. The history also seems like it can be deleted, but if it needs to be retained the page can be moved to a subpage of Template:Talkheader. —Zach425 talk / contribs 04:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Film estensibile
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Stretch wrap (links to redirect)

Delete. No reason to suppose anyone would search for this in English Wikipedia by its Italian name. Originally this was an article in Italian, then changed to a redirect to the already existing English article on the same subject. JamesBWatson (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - per nom. —Zach425 talk / contribs 05:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Global empire
The result of the discussion was retarget to Empire. Jafeluv (talk) 14:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → List of major empires (links to redirect)

Unlikely thing to be seeking Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Observation I've Renamed/Moved the article prior to this issue being brought here. The "article" appears to be just that - a mere list. And there is already an articles on empires. So maybe the posting here is now academic. I've also edited out the word "global" as redundant - what empires worthy of the name are not "global"? So I do not think there's anything needing discussion now. --Ludvikus (talk) 02:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * In particular, I don't think there's any controversy in the move that has already been made. --Ludvikus (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Ill defined term per Orange. Would much prefer a list of possible articles to look through in a search then being brought directly to this redirect.  The underlying article is up for prod, as it should be.  We already have a List of empires and a List of largest empires. So what a List of major empires? List of empires I think are really kick ass empires because I personally heard of them? It is up for prod, let it die a quiet death and its redirects.--Work permit (talk) 02:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Empire - although List of major empires will soon be justafilably deleted under prod, Global empire receives a LOT of incoming traffic. Empire seems like a reasonable target since, as Ludvikus said, "global" is redundant when describing an empire. —Zach425 talk / contribs 06:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)