Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 September 27

September 27
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 27, 2009

Slow Blind Driveway
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Rjanag per criterion R2 (cross-namespace redirect)  — Gavia immer (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * → Wikipedia:Silly Things/Slow Blind Driveway (links to redirect)

Unencyclopedic and potentially confusing cross-namespace redirect (which is protected so I couldn't add the RFD template to it). If protection is necessary, it should be create protected, not edit protected. snigbrook (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Hmmph! This redirect was formed when an attempt at humour was moved from articlespace to project space. Frankly, I don't see the target essay as something worth keeping (I don't see the purported humour at all); I'd recommend that this be taken to WP:MfD (before the move, this would have gone to WP:AfD, whereupon it would have been executed as a hoax. As to the redirect in question: should the target be deleted through MfD, the redirect will be swiftly gone, too. Before then, it's a bit more problematic - should the target go to MfD, I'd recommend deferring a decision on this until the fate of the target is decided. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This has no place in the main encyclopedia. -- Ja Ga  talk 20:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if this page is taken to MfD and is kept, the redirect is entirely inappropriate and a bad use of a CNR. —Zach425 talk / contribs 06:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This redirect has been speedily deleted WP:CSD (Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace) by Rjanag and can now be closed. -- ToET 00:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Texas toothpick
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 07:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Baculum (links to redirect)

The target page does not mention "texas toothpick". In addition, there seems to be quite some disagreement on what the phrase refers to. I've seen suggested "baculum", "spud bar", and fried jalapeños (the only article that actually mentions the phrase). Given the confusion, I recommend just deleting the redirect. Powers T 18:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as there are too many possibilities: it's often used as a slang term for the baculum of various animals (most notably raccoon, from what I've seen), but it also refers to a type of jackknife (it seems and  are sold under this description, for example). Go past the second page of the Google search of "Texas toothpick" (entire phrase) and you'll see nothing (as of this post) but commercial knife listings (I've also seen this referred to as a type of Bowie knife). If the redirect is to be kept, it should point to an article (or disambiguation page) dealing with a specific type of knife. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlikely redirect target. In my experience (backed up by Google) I've only heard this term in the context of knives. -- Ja Ga  talk 20:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Julie Sutton



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was dabified (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 06:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Julie Skinner (links to redirect)

Another Julie Sutton (mayor) exists now, so a redirect from the maiden name of a sportsperson who appears to have (mainly) competed under her married name, should not occupy the primary Julie Sutton page. A hatnote on the mayor's page to the sportsperson could be added when this is done. The-Pope (talk) 12:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * I have boldly dabified the page. There should also be a redirect for Julie Sutton (curler) or Julie Sutton (curling) - maybe both - as they are more likely search terms than looking for the married name of a person who won her Olympic medal under her birth name (I don't believe she was married when she competed in Salt Lake City). As far as the issue of primary use is concerned, Canadians would favor the athlete, Australians would favor the politician, and the rest of the world won't see either one be the dominant use of the name. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as dabified - we should wait a couple of months to find out how much of the traffic from the page goes to the mayor vs. the curler, which will suggest a primary use. To aid in this test, I've set up a redirect at Julie Sutton (curler) and modified Julie Sutton per the precedent at Lincoln. —Zach425 talk / contribs 07:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Musician
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 08:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * → Template:WPBiography (links to redirect)

This is a leftover. None is using it anymore. I suggest we delete it, as I should be from the moment that was succeeded by WPBiography. Magioladitis (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * I find it amazing that this is not being used by Wikiproject Musicians in any fashion. Perhaps it should be deleted in case someone wishes to make a new template, but it seems more useful (and user-friendly) to retarget to Template:WikiProject Music/Related WikiProjects, a template that provides an overview of WikiProject Music and its related WikiProjects. When I was writing and edited music-related articles, I found the lack of a music or a Wikiproject Music Wikiproject template disconcerting when the more-specialised WikiProjects had their own to place on various talk pages. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Tōkkaidō Main Line



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep all as plausible misspellings (non-admin close). B.Wind (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of redirects from these unnatural / unlikely misspellings (which are unlikely to be useful in searching or linking) is proposed. In Japanese, "ōkk" spelling never occurs. More broadly, chōon is never immediately followed by sokuon.Tokek (talk) 03:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * → Tōkaidō Main Line (links to redirect)
 * → Tōkaidō (road) (links to redirect) 
 * → Tōkaidō (region) (links to redirect) 
 * → Tōkaido (karate) (links to redirect) 
 * → Tōkai region (links to redirect) 
 * → Tōkaidō Shinkansen‎ (links to redirect) 

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep all. I understand Japanese orthography quite well, and I still sometimes trip over the similarity between "Tokaido" and "Hokkaido". Someone with no knowledge of the language is even more likely to do so, since the island of Hokkaido is more prominent. These are plausible typos, though Tōkkai region is slightly less so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavia immer (talk • contribs) 00:47, 29 September 2009
 * That, and one person would have to go through the trouble of linking or searching with macrons, which makes it even less likely. The redirects appear to have been made as a reaction to this edit . —Tokek (talk) 11:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all - these don't appear to be doing any harm. If anything, they may be helping those misguided souls who are not aware that chōon is never immediately followed by sokuon in Japanese. —Zach425 talk / contribs 07:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Talkheaderlong
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * → Template:Talk header (links to redirect)

Yet another meaningless redirect of talk header. Edit history is mainly tests in the direction of talk header. Magioladitis (talk) 00:56, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unfortunately, WP:CSD did not exist back in 2006 so a quick and cheap redirect was used instead. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'