Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 25

April 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 25, 2010

Banoogie



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 03:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Feces (links to redirect • [ history] • )

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete with prejudice owing to the likelihood of anyone using it being infinitessimal. Mobius Clock 17:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources saying that banoogie is feces. Décembër21st2012Freâk   Talk at 00:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsensical. –Grondemar 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Physic



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Disambiguate. Now go make it better. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 04:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Physics (links to redirect • [ history] • )

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete or disambiguate. Almost plausible redirect, but it could also refer to physicians. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate or keep redirect. --Love Krittaya (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete  or better, disambiguate and explain. As is, it's just plain wrong: historically, this term  does not refer   to physics.  DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are a few references (a total of about 12 in mainspace), most of which are in the form Physics, which obviously should be just changed to Physics , although I don't want to do it while this debate is in progress.  However, some seem to date to the middle ages, and may refer to medicine.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate or soft redirect to physic. ~ Ningauble (talk) 23:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Wiktionary per WP:DABNOT, using . Having slept on this, it is not a "term likely to be the natural title for more than one article." None of the articles on subjects to which meanings of the word pertain would plausibly be entitled "Physic" in the modern era. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate or soft redirect to Wiktionary per Ningauble. Décembër21st2012Freâk   Talk at 00:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Soft redir to Wiktionary based on the rationale that if just deleted, someone's bound to recreate it; it's an obvious, if misguided redirect. Mobius Clock 20:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate and put in a wiktionary box. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate, this could refer to physics, medicine and is a type I've seen several times for psychic. Thryduulf (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate - in additon to a very plausible "misspelling," there are multiple terms and meanings involving the word "physic." 147.70.242.54 (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)