Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 16

August 16
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 16, 2010

The_Audio_Preservation_Fund



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 23:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * → Record-Rama (links to redirect • [ history] • )

seems to point to redirect to a project that there was a connection to, but there is no online evidence this is so. should be a stand alone article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.231.182.113 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 16 August 2010 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - mentioned in the target and perfectly respectable search term. This can be converted to a stand-alone article at any time irrespective of the result of this discussion. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems like a rather reasonable search term, with some traffic. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  19:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hand me the keys you fucking cocksucker!



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 23:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * → The Usual Suspects (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete it. Inappropriate  Pur ple  back pack 89    16:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - created by a now banned sock. This is one of the so-called, in popular culture circles, 'memorable quotes' of the film target. However, there is quite some debate as to the exact wording and punctuation of the quote. Virtually no hits. It doesn't appear in the target so, in my view, this would be confusing to a searcher. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete While it may not be inappropriate, there are no pages linking to the redirect, it is unused and receives little to no traffic. Whatever the lines are to the film, they aren't that notable. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  19:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unlikely search term; non-notable quotation. Uncle Dick (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Caltech's rival



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Hacks at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology..  Lenticel  ( talk ) 23:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * → Massachusetts Institute of Technology (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete no point insuch an obscure redirect Polargeo (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to Hacks at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Entirely reasonable search term. Long-standing redirect. Deletion may break links in external sites and reduce search options for no benefit. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * What Bridgeplayer said  Pur ple  back pack 89    16:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hussain Manzoor



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Kept and tagged as unprintworthy. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


 * → Manzoor Hussain (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Deletion - The actual name of the person is Manzoor Hussain. In official olympics report, the names are written in Last First format and the creator of this didn't realize it. —  Hamza  [ talk ]  07:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - if the creator got confused, it is likely that other readers will similarly get confused and will search on this name. This gets a number of hits each month so it is clear that this is an entirely plausible search term. It is not misleading since it doesn't refer to anyone else. Redirects are cheap and there is no reason to delete. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't see much of any traffic. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  19:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - 111 hits in the last 3 complete months. Not huge, but enough to show that it is used and, since it is harmless, and keeping is cost free, there seems no reason to delete. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep, as Bridgeplayer says, creator confusion means that it's more plausible. The fact that an official source is presenting his name in this format makes it much more plausible.  Nyttend (talk) 02:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)