Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 30

August 30
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 30, 2010

Duane Reasoner, Jr.



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Fort Hood shooting for now. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → Jihobbyist (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Reasoner isn't mentioned in the article. This redirect was put up for deletion a month ago and kept on the grounds that there was an active dispute over whether the article would talk about Reasoner or not, but it seems stable now. Prezbo (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Revolution Muslim where his role is mentioned. He is not separately notable so a red link would be of no benefit. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me. I'm sorry, I should have checked if he was mentioned in any other articles.Prezbo (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes that works, somebody keeps removing him from jihobbyist. BTW, the guy is notable enough for his own article as quite a lot of material about him appeared in the worldwide press as one of Nidal Hasan's few associates who evidently did not condemn, and probably approved of Hasan's attack, and may have discussed his plans beforehand. It cannot be explained why authorities apparently did not question this man, or put him on a list of persons not be allowed on the base. His whereabouts are currently unknown, but he should have been indicted as a co-conspirator, as Anwar al-Awlaki should have been. Bachcell (talk) 15:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since his comments were entirely unrelated to his membership of Revolution Muslim, I have removed the statements relating to Reasoner from that article. As such that would not be an appropriate re-target. wjemather bigissue  18:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - let's see if it stays out first. If it does Fort Hood shooting is also a valid retarget. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'