Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 4

December 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 4, 2010

Zhenzhou-Xi'an High-speed Railway



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * → Zhengxi Passenger Railway (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. Uncommon, and possibly implausible (save for some Chinese), mis-spelling of the Henan capital. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 21:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, as implausible search term. Reh  man  11:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Interstate 640 (North Carolina)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * → Interstate 540 (North Carolina) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

No mention of name in article and the interstate does not exist. →Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  21:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, misleading. Reh  man  11:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Armed Police



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Armed forces, obvious popular search term  Reh  man  11:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


 * → People& (links to redirect • [ history] • )

The word "armed police" refers to anywhere in the world, not necessarily the People's Republic of China. It should redirect to Police, or something like that. 81.98.97.252 (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Disambiguate - several plausible targets. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Pro-Iranism



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Converted to a disambiguation page. Redirects as search terms are only useful if they get the user where they want to be. As Rd232 points out, can refer to a political stance so a dab page is a better choice. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * → Persophilia (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Persophilia is about people/culture/history; "pro-Iranism" is a political stance. They're not the same at all. I'm not sure whether pro-Iranism merits an entry, but it certainly shouldn't redirect there. See also the similar pro-Iran redirect. Rd232 talk 02:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete both, not much links to it either. Reh  man  13:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep both - plausible search terms that are helpful to searchers. Redirects are purely search aids and don't need to be technically correct; see WP:RNEUTRAL. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Bridgeplayer. Reh  man  10:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)