Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 February 22

February 22
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 22, 2010

Wowomg.com



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Discussion moot, page deleted per A7 by another admin. Consider taking to DRV, or relisting at RfD if redirect is restored to fully gain consensus. --Taelus (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this and all similar redirects that are not mentioned in article, not notable. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all nominated redirects targeted to Shock site as none of the terms in question appear in the target. It seems every two or three years we have to thin out the redirect weeds that tend to grow about this particular target article. Unlike in 2007 and 2008, the target shows no sign of these terms. B.Wind (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * One problems with the "does not appear in target" argument: at least some of these redirects did target information in the article or elsewhere until relatively recently. Most of these redirects are quite old and are almost guaranteed to be linked externally. Some of these redirects have hundreds of hits per month, and in at least one case, thousands, which strongly suggests they are "useful" per WP:RFD.  Default to keep in the absence of clear, convincing and specific arguments for specific redirects. Gimmetrow 16:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

LemonParty.org



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete all as batch nomination, points identical in each. (Too lazy or messy? Please feel free to ask me to revert the bundling) --Taelus (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

LemonParty

 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. Creates ambiguity as to whether the redirected article actually exists or not. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Lemonparty.org

 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note - subject of an RfD in 2007. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Lemonparty

 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Note - subject of an RfD in 2007. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

List of shock sites/Uncited



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Histmerge to List of shock sites --Taelus (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unlikely search term with the /uncited at end. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment this is a former workpage. It should have been sitting in talkspace though... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 07:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Apparently a former page listing shocksites. It was uncited, possibly the reason for the uncited prefix. Right now, it's useless, implausible and misleading, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  16:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Four years after a "keep" AfD, it's past time to put this clearly temporary page to sleep. Maybe Deletionpedia would like to preserve This diff for posterity. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge history. This was the original List of shock sites article, moved in April 2006, and its history should be kept for attribution purposes. Gimmetrow 23:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Penis Bird



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Oralse.cx



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 00:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Note subject of a deletion discussion in 2006. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Www.lemonparty.com



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Penis bird



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no good reason for this redirect. A Google search doesn't reveal a reliable definition. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Penisbird



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Shock site (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target, and shouldn't be. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Does not appear in target. It shouldn't be redirected in this way just because it's (presumably) a shock site. We don't redirect non-notable websites to Website, why should this be any different? Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no good reason for this redirect. A Google search doesn't reveal a reliable definition. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Aldo Giovanni Borel



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:CSD. Thryduulf (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * → Aldo Borel (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Should be deleted, I created it without paying attention. The real full name of the player is Aldo Giuseppe Borel, not Aldo Giovanni Borel. Geregen2 (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Tagged for speedy deletion based on above - db-author is a good tag for use when you wish to delete redirects that you've created. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Law's Diving-goose



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn - I'm interpreting nom's last post as one of withdrawing the nomination and there appears no support for deletion (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * → Chendytes lawi (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This name has not been used outside Wikipedia and its mirrors, and appears to be original research, a translation of the scientific name by which this fossil is always known —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:03, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately the page was at "Law's Diving-goose" for about 4 years so all the wiki mirrors etc. use this term, thus there is the distinct possibility that it will be used as a search term.--Kevmin (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that Wikipedia-only usage is enough to do so much as keep a redirect. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as redirect was created by a move to its current name. Since the article was originally here (and was at this name for four years), it would be a reasonable assumption that some editors and readers would be looking for the article at the former name (per WP:RFD). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - High traffic (529 views last month, in January 2010), probably because of the reasons above. Obviously being used, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  16:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I think this redirect should be kept, despite this name's being unsuitable as OR for the article. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Small-eyed Duck



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn - I'm interpreting nom's last post as one withdrawing the nomination; there appears no support for deletion (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * → Talpanas (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This name has never actually been used, and was only given as the article title since the user who created the article (who does not understand English fluently) read a descriptive mention of "a small-eyed duck" (see Talk:Talpanas for details). —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think it does any harm, and there may still be incoming links from elsewhere on the Internet, or people who have read the "small-eyed duck" piece somewhere (it does appear on the Internet, though not in reliable sources I think). Ucucha 19:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that Wikipedia-only usage is enough to even keep a redirect. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * I guess this should be kept, see above discussion. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 15:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Although I would initially havre said delete, there's a surprisingly high amount of traffic, probably caused by the reasons Ucucha gave, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Lesser Antillean Bananaquit



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete as made-up term, no usages in non-Wiki sources --Taelus (talk) 00:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Bananaquit (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This name has never actually been used: it is original research, a possible future name. It is protected due to a now resolved editing dispute, so I can't add Rfd to it. Since it may be used in the future (if the Bananaquit is split into several species) it should not be creation protected. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * comment. I've added the tag for you. I have no opinion about the redirect at this point. Thryduulf (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Clarification: there is no reason for this page to remain protected; it was forgotten when the other bananaquit articles were unprotected. Unlike the two pages above it was created recently and has always been a redirect. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 15:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the fact that this was at the center of a heated editing dispute is reason enough to believe that the name is a plausible search term (if it were not such a term, there would be no such disagreement of such heat). The existence of a redirect is not predicated on whether or not the subject actually exists, but on whether or not people actually use the term in their searches (or at least likely to do so). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It wasn't much of a dispute. The term was invented about a week ago by Famedalupi, who is blocked temporarily. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 23:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Term does not appear anywhere outside Wikipedia, and the redirect has not been around for a substantial period of time. Might even be speediable under R3. Ucucha 02:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to be a coined term, as the phrase appears online only in Wikipedia and I have yet to find a single source offline with this name in its index. B.Wind (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Cheese soup



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 04:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Cheese (links to redirect • [ history] • )

No such topic discussed in article; and everyone anyway knows what cheese is! ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  cabinet  ─╢ 16:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Weak delete - while the phrase "cheese soup" is used with some regularity in Wikipedia, there is not a good target for the redirect (if there were an article for fonduta or beer cheese soup, perhaps...). The mentions are too scattered for even a decent dab page. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not mentioned in target article, and it seems rather odd, like redirecting "Apple Pie" to "Apple"... --Taelus (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ambiguous, and not mentioned. Per Taelus, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Soup where it is mentioned. This is a perfectly valid concept. It has been around for over four years so it will appear widely in mirrors and it is a plausible search term. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I had originally thought of that as a possible option, but it seemed that the mention at the target section was too trivial to do the redirect justice. It might be best (somehow) to create a List of cheese soups article and then point the redirect to it. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for the time being. IP is now developing a list article at User:B.Wind/sandbox3. When the new article is moved into articlespace, a redirect to it can be established. B.Wind (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thick Girls, Big Girls

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per R3. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * → Raven-Symoné (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Needs to be deleted. Hoax title for an EP, and the title effectively serves as an attack page. &mdash;Kww(talk) 13:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete per nom. Had this been an article, WP:HAMMER would also apply. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)