Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 February 23

February 23
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 23, 2010

Pang Mun-Il



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 04:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → 2008 Summer Olympics national flag bearers (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Deletion. The target does not have any information on the subject, he is just part of the list. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, the list tells you he was the flag bearer, and that he was an official. Polarpanda (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This needs to be a redlink so people who view the list know that person does not have an article. Having redlinks help people to create non-existent articles, while leaving this blue-linked back to the same list where he is mentioned is pointless. If someone was searching for him, they would find the list if need be. Tavix | Talk  12:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * But you are assuming there should be an article at this title. As an official, rather than an athlete, he doesn't automatically qualify. Polarpanda (talk) 12:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He was an Olympic flag bearer. I'm not going to say that's automatically notable, but it has to have some merit, right? They're not going to take some random guy off the street and give him the country's flag. Tavix | Talk  10:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for precisely the reasons stated immediately above by Tavix (and magnified by Polarpanda). Currently, there doesn't appear to be sufficient evidence of Pang's meeting WP:BIO; thus the creation of a redlink would not be an appropriate action. Keeping a redirect that would give the name some meaning would be. B.Wind (talk) 01:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. I also fixed the flag bearer list so that there wasn't a wikilink for his name that only led back to the list itself. –Grondemar 02:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)