Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 February 9

February 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 9, 2010

The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspecive
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * → The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Nothing links to this redirect, and it redirects to a pretty underused article, so I wouldn't call this a common typo. ~ neko-chan :3 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, implausible. Leaving out the T is no more likely than leaving out any other letter.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 05:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, the only reason it exists at all is because an editor (me) created it by correcting a mis-spelling in an argument title. Ronabop (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

IPad Nano
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * → IPhone (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Neither of iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch mention “iPod Nano” in any way. I think this redirect should be deleted. Svick (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - too easily confused with iPod Nano. While the title is a foreseeable mistype of the product name "iPod Nano", it is clearly a different item. The Apple website does not mention an "iPad Nano", either. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm concerned someone will feel this redirect implies that the "ipad nano" exists. The fact that iPhone doesn't indicate its existence won't really help - we have lots of pages like that where the mere existence of the redirect says something. That this redirect exists is in itself misinformation. ErikHaugen (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The iPhone is not an "iPad nano". Misleading redirect. –Grondemar 04:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't exist, and Wikipedia shouldn't be propagating some meme that the one is just a "nano" version of the other.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 05:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just misleading. Recreate in some form if the thing is ever made, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

"Nathan Kirsh"
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per WP:CSD. –xenotalk 15:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


 * → Nathan Kirsh (links to redirect • [ history] • )

The redirect is not needed since it is unlikely that anyone would be looking up the subject with quotation marks around the person's name. The redirect can be deleted. Warrah (talk) 02:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Monkeys in Space
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Monkeys in space; I'm not adding a hatnote to the new target, since there's no concensus here about it; however, that may be done regardless of this discussion by anyone who consiuders it necessary. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * → List of My Name Is Earl episodes (links to redirect • [ history] • )

I think a redirect for an episode title of any tv show (or likes) is only needed in very few cases (and not in this one), since its only a redirect to a list with rather few information. Amtiss, SNAFU ? 18:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. I think it's a possible search term, and we should point to the little info we have about that episode. Svick (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Monkeys in space and add a hatnote like The Hero of This Nation says. Svick (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - target clearly shows that "Monkeys in Space" is Episode 14 of the series. A synopsis is provided there. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget per above and below (as an alternate spelling). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Monkeys in space and add hatnote if you must. The Hero of This Nation (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget and hat per above. –xenotalk 15:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Monkeys in space as a neat solution. However, I don't really think a hat note is needed. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Monkeys in space. –Grondemar 04:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)