Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 July 3

July 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 3, 2010

Womens's Alliance (Iceland)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 00:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * → Women& (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unlikely misspelling Muhandes (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 *  → Women& (links to redirect • [ history] • ) Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or... - I don't find this a particularly implausible typo. Creating the possessive of words can be problematic and there is no reason why a searcher might not get this one wrong. However, even if not plausible, it does not meet any criterion of WP:RFD. There is, however, a more important issue. There is also a redirect Women's Alliance (Iceland). This party is not mentioned in the article and I haven't been able to source a clear connection though, admittedly, I haven't explored sources in Icelandic! Unless a reason for these redirects can be shown then they both should be deleted as confusing. I have added the alternative to this nomination so that they can both be considered together. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - there are also some redirects from Icelandic Samtök um kvennalista, Kvennalistinn, and some alternative spellings. I don't speak Icelandic, but kvenna is women, and lista is list. There is nothing implying alliance. (As a side note: since I just went over all occurrences of "womens" I have the exact numbers. There are 182 redirects from misspellings of "women's". 158 of which are "womens", 23 are "womens'" and just one is "womens's". So I believe it is implausible, and falls under rule 8 of WP:RFD. But Bridgeplayer's point is stronger anyway delete both) --Muhandes (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)