Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 March 1

March 1
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 1, 2010

High Bridge of Kentucky (not the town)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → High Bridge of Kentucky (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. Highly unlikely search term, and both an odd and unnecessary way of disambiguating the page with High Bridge, Kentucky (a hatnote suffices in this case). TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 20:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Declare Englishman not Kentuckian, but have been to the state of Kentucky. If it is not the town, what is it, the state? Are readers meant to guess? I was tempted to invoke WP:NOT but that is not really relevant, but we don't define a subject by saying what it is not, if we assume that we try to define say what something is, rather than exclude what it is not. Also an unlikely search term. Propose rename of KFC to (Not necessarily from Kentucky) Fried Chicken.

Si Trew (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, nobody will ever enter that phrase as a search term. –Grondemar 05:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, improper qualifier. -- &oelig; &trade; 09:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - High Bridge (Kentucky) has been created as a disambiguation page. This should serve the purpose of the malformed redirect. B.Wind (talk) 21:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as improper.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 07:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Radiohead trivia



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Radiohead (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Completely unnecessary. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Not very well-used (11 hits last month), and no clear need. The page was apparently made a redirect rather than deleting as trivia back in 2007. Cnilep (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Has anyone attempted to integrate this content into the Radiohead article? If not then, because of the prior edit history, I think proper process here would be to revert back before the redirect and AfD it. -- &oelig; &trade; 09:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Integrate into the article and keep the redirect.    DGG ( talk ) 20:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if the trivia is integrated into the article, WP:TRIVIA discourages sections of trivia. Thus the redirect would be misleading as it implies the existence of such a section in Radiohead. B.Wind (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I am error



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was at today's RfD page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Zelda II: The Adventure of Link (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target article. I understand the significance, it is the name of a glitch which occurs in the game, but it is not really notable enough to recieve a mention, thus having a navigational aid pointing you there to try find out about it just seems misleading. Taelus (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep The title may not be as you prefer/ But I find not it lends any confusion/ The thing should stand, it will not make me err/ Delete it if it causes you contusion.


 * Oh dear me. I think I made an iamb error. Si Trew (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'