Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 March 14

March 14
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 14, 2010

Template:Tfd1-inline



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete --Taelus (talk) 09:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Template:Tfd-inline (links to redirect • [ history] • )

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - Redirect that is never used, to a template that is deprecated itself. JokerXtreme (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Tfd1-inline returns no incoming links. Cunard (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Dream.16



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.


 * → DREAM (Mixed Martial Arts) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Redirect created as a placeholder for a possible future event: WP:CRYSTAL applies. Drmies (talk) 22:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll withdraw this nomination in light of, for instance, Articles for deletion/UFC 117. I think it makes little sense to have a bunch of placeholders, but apparently they serve a function--to prevent bad articles. Any passing admin, care to close this? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Buergenstock Declaration



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy close - nomination withdrawn (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 05:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * → Cahn–Ingold–Prelog priority rules (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Propose deletion. No longer in target. The section on this item was removed for reasons given on talk page of target. Jmcclaskey54 (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * comment: why not redirect to Prelog bio page with link to website mentioned V8rik (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Withdraw nomination: suggestion by V8rik appreciated. The "declaration" is not mentioned in Prelog bio, but the suggestion presumes a prior question of notability that should be resolved before that of redirect deletion. I have commented further on target talk page. Can I ask an admin to close this as well? Thanks. Jmcclaskey54 (talk) 19:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)