Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 May 17

May 17
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 17, 2010




 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD R3 by JohnCD . Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Naturally (J. J, Cale album)

 * → Naturally (J. J. Cale album) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Improbable, made from a move error. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy delete - tagged as CSD R3. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Ignatius Breen



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget first to Joseph Breen, delete second. JohnCD (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Joseph I. Breen (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 *  → Joseph I. Breen (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Delete both - two three year-old redirects. Both currently point to Joseph I. Breen which following my page move is now a redirect to the main article Joseph Breen. Both old redirects are highly implausible search terms. Sources do not generally refer to Breen using either his middle initial or his full middle name. Even in the very unlikely event that someone searches for "Joseph Ignatius Breen" the prompted search will give them the main redirect "Joseph I. Breen" well before "Joseph Ignatius". Even if the first is deemed useful, the second with the "(censor)" disambiguation is not since both it and the first will come up together in a search. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Can someone fix the coding for the second nom? I can't see what the problem is. Thanks. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It calls template rfd2/helper which has been deleted. I'll follow that up, but it doesn't matter here. JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It calls template rfd2/helper which has been deleted. I'll follow that up, but it doesn't matter here. JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget Joseph Ignatius Breen to Joseph Breen - plausible search term and plenty of Google hits. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Joseph Ignatius Breen (censor) - unlikely search term and not widely picked up in the mirrors. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

愛知工業大学名電高等学校



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 04:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → ja:愛知工業大学名電高等学校 (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. Interwiki redirects like this don't actually work, and aren't helpful to readers of this encyclopedia. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as interwiki redirect. FWIW this redirects to a page, that Google translates as "Scientific current high school", which appears to be a school in the Aichi Prefecture, Japan. We don't have an English page on this school. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete interwiki redirects do not work. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 05:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Short final



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Airfield traffic pattern (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unable to find any good information about "short final", and the redirect seems incorrect because there is no indication of "short final" being relevant to the targeted page. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 12:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - text on "short final" has been added to the target article, although I am still seeking a ref for it. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - as explained above it has now been added to the target. Having done a Gsearch, it appears to be a valid aviation term though there is considerable debate about what part of the approach constitutes a 'short final'. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - It is a valid aviation term and in common use, but is nothing more than a dictionary definition by itself - not enough for an actual article. Furthermore it is not well defined. I have been though several aviation dictionaries, textbooks and glossaries, as well as an extensive on-line search and have not found it defined anywhere. - Ahunt (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep a variant type of final approach, so should point to the final approach article; it is a valid search term regardless of actually using the phrase "short final" on the article, since it is an adjective "short" used on "final" (diminutive of "final approach") and therefore appropriate redirect. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 05:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per IP Aleksa Lukic (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)