Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 May 20

May 20
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 20, 2010

Tim James (composer)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retargeted boldly. Once I got things rearranged this seemed like a no-brainer. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:53, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Tim James (songwriter) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Ambiguous redirect. Both Tim James (songwriter) and Tim James (music producer) are in a sense composers. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Retarget to Tim James since there are a country music songwriter (whose article is now at Tim James (country music songwriter) and a record producer (Tim James (music producer)) who can both logically be called composers. Ten Pound Hammer , his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC) The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
 * Convert to disambiguation page - long-standing redirect and foreseeable search term. I note, for example, that this precise formulation is used here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Tim James as suggested above. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

The Ground Beneath Their Feet



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete all. It would be appropriate to recreate The Ground Beneath Their Feet if reliable sources tie it to The Hungry Earth. -- Black Falcon (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → Doctor Who (series 5) (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * → Doctor Who (series 5) (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * → Doctor Who (series 5) (links to redirect • [ history] • })

We now have all thirteen episode names for the current series, and these are not them. They appear to have been created on the basis of unreliable sources, and I believe they need to be deleted as they are misleading. They were created some time ago so speedy doesn't seem to apply. Edgepedia (talk) 12:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Episode 8 and The Requiem of Rassilon, the Episode 8 redirect is too general for a redirect, someone may be searching for the eighth episode of another show, only to get to a different show. As for The Ground Beneath Their Feet, well that can be redirected to The Hungry Earth, since T.G.B.T.F was the rumoured title of that episode. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Episode 8 is too general and misleading; the other two are not mentioned in the target or substantive articles. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all as drivel. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► person of reasonable firmness ─╢ 14:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete All Episode 8 could refer to any show that has more than 7 episodes. The others are based on speculation and unsourced. If you can source that The Ground Beneath Their Feet was a prior title to refer to The Hungry Earth, I'd be okay with re-redirecting it there but until you can do so, it should be removed as well. Regards  So Why  14:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

List of major episodes



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → List of Major (manga) episodes (links to redirect • [ history] • )

I believe this is a misleading redirect and this redirect might cause confusion   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  07:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Inappropriate as a redirect. Useless as a disambig. &mdash; RHaworth 07:15, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this was left over from a page move; I have fixed the one incoming link. I agree that it is misleading. I also nominate List of MAJOR episodes for the same reason. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nom(s). ╟─ Treasury Tag ► duumvirate ─╢ 17:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both - as said above, it is a weird, misleading, confusing redirect, especially seeing as (a) "major" refers more often to the military rank or an adjective meaning important, not a manga; and (b) people searching for "major episodes" will still find "List of Major (manga) episodes." cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 05:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Bangkok



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was dabified by 70.29.210.155. -- Black Falcon (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * → May 2010 Thai military crackdown (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Redirect left after renaming. Just an inappropriate name for the incident. SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment: The original title of "Battle of Bangkok" is appropriate as the conflict in question was between 2 opposing forces using arms, resulting in casualtis on both sides. If by choosing "May 2010 Thai military crackdown" as an alternative title is meant to spare the feelings of any one side or give a show of being impartial, I would suggest instead that both sides be given the legitimacy of being listed as equal beligerents. Sixer Fixer (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - this redirect is not giving a name, appropriate or inappropriate, to the incident. It is simply a means by which readers can find the information they are seeking. The term 'Battle of Bangkok' is used in the lead, and in a number of reliable sources. It is an entirely foreseeable search term and an obvious keep. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)