Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 October 17

October 17
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 17, 2010

Economy of sk



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * → Economy of South Korea (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. Extremely unlikely search term, made by now-blocked user. Geschichte (talk) 19:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. This is ambiguous and hence confusing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Geschichte. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Aqua Buddha



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was : deleted per Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_12 (G4) and G10. Frank  |  talk  19:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

This redirect seems to be based on current political attacks against the candidate Rand Paul. There is no mention of Aqua Buddha on the Rand Paul page (if there was, it has probably been removed). As such, there is no reason to redirect to Rand Paul. Baksiidaa (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Rand Paul (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Comment - I have alerted the creator User:Kuralyov. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and so tagged - previously deleted at Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 12. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * My opinion is unchanged from the last RfD: Delete. The target article doesn't mention 'Aqua Buddha' (most of the time).'' --Pjacobi (talk) 18:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

System T



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * → Modal logic (links to redirect • [ history] • )

I don't see any mention of System T in the target section or even in the target article; in my opinion, this redirect should be deleted. a3_nm (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment - I have alerted the creator User:Elonka. Bridgeplayer (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * FWIW, von Wright's modal logic T is actually defined further up in the article (Modal logic), so that would be a better target. However, I don't see a need for this redirect, if anything it would be more useful to mention the modal logic at T (disambiguation), as "System" is not really part of the name of the system. Moreover, "System T" without further qualification is more likely to refer to Gödel's T rather than von Wright's logic (NB, both existing links to System T from article space refer to Gödel's T).—Emil J. 17:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * disambig Seems that a short disambig page would explain the differences better.--Salix (talk): 07:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Moist Vagina



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retearget to All Apologies. Ruslik_ Zero 18:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * → Rape Me (links to redirect • [ history] • )

With all due respect, there are other notable uses for "moist vagina." This could just as easily redirect to female orgasm or vagina. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to All Apologies which has significantly more information on the song. The capitals provide disambiguation but adding a 'Redirect' hatnote to Vaginal lubrication would probably be helpful. Bridgeplayer (talk) 13:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, although All Apologies still doesn't have much on it. Tezero (talk) 15:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)