Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 October 25

October 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 25, 2010

Britophile



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Anglophile. T. Canens (talk) 03:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * → British Invasion (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Implaussible redirect, it's not an alternate term DC   T • C   19:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to Anglophile as plausible search term. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment – I'm assuming that a Britophile is usually used to mean an American who loves British music from the British Invasion. A redirect obviously does not have to be an alternative term for its target; it only has to reasonably related.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  14:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've never heard that usage. I'd also agree with pointing it to Anglophile.   DC   T • C   02:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Anglophile. A quick search of GoogleBooks indicates that the term is used broadly for love of Britain and all things British, not just for musicians of the "British Invasion." Redirects from the general to the particular are inherently confusing. Although English is actually more specific than British, it is a much better fit than is a group of musicians. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)