Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 October 31

October 31
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2010

Surigao (disambiguation)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * → Surigao (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. The target is not a disambiguation page, which makes this redirect confusing for the reader. There used to be a dab page under the title, but it was replaced with a hatnote in the Surigao article that points directly to the two other articles. Jafeluv (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - the disamb page has been superceded by the use of hatnotes so it is now misleading. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Nuclear power plant



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:58, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * → Template:Infobox power station (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Including its: talkpage, and doc page
 * → Template:Infobox power station (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Including its: talkpage, and doc page
 * → Template:Infobox power station (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Including its: doc page
 * → Template:Infobox power station (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Deletion: Implausible redirects, and to avoid confusing editors by appearing in search results. All of these redirects have no history and no/very few links to it. I have left the Template:Infobox nuclear power station redirect as it has significant history. Rehman(+) 13:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Biggest mountain in south africa



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Deleted. Bridgeplayer sums it up well. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * → Table Mountain (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete - "Biggest mountain" is not a well-defined concept. Table Mountain is certainly not the tallest mountain in South Africa. If there were a List of mountains in South Africa article I'd suggest redirecting to that, but there isn't. htonl (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to Geog of SA. Rich Farmbrough, 19:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC).

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * That's a good solution. Thank you. Nomination withdrawn. - htonl (talk) 19:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - though I usually support such retargeting, I don't find this to be helpful. There is simply nothing about the largest, biggest, tallest etc mountain in South Africa, or really anything relevant to the redirect in the target. Both the existing target and the redirect would simply leave readers confused. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Mint poison dart frog (disambiguation)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * → Mint poison dart frog (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete - unnecessary disambiguation page that only redirects to one article. Brianhe (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - essentially harmless and could be useful - see WP:INTDABLINK. No valid deletion reason given in the nomination. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's customary to make a redirect to disambiguation pages from "X (disambiguation)", even if the dab page itself is simply called X. This allows separating the links knowingly pointing to the dab page from others that simply need fixing to point to the right article. We have a whole lot of such redirects, actually. Jafeluv (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:INTDABLINK and because nominator has not provided a valid rationale for deletion. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  18:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)