Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 22

September 22
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 22, 2010

Here's Your Christmas Album (Bonus Track)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → Bill Engvall (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unlikely redirect term. He did have an album titled Here's Your Christmas Album, but the (bonus track) appendage is very unlikely to be typed in. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as unlikely. Redirect to Here's Your Christmas Album if kept. - 2/0 (cont.) 09:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - being an "Unlikely redirect term" is not a deletion ground for a long-standing redirect. However, neither the target, nor the suggested retarget, mention the bonus track so it should be deleted as confusing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;confusing redirect when pointed at Bill Engvall. A retarget to Here's Your Christmas Album would be appropriate if that article mentioned a bonus track. –Grondemar 23:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

"The Monastery Among The Temple Trees"



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was SPEEDY DELETE (R3). Alexf(talk) 15:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → The Monastery Among The Temple Trees (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Hardly anyone would type the inverted commas when they search. TYelliot (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Indeed. I believe it can be tagged for speedy deletion under the R3 criteria and will do so at this time.-- Pink Bull  14:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:ISO



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:43, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → Template:Use ymd dates (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * → Template:Use ymd dates (links to redirect • [ history] • )

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete – unused redirects. The ISO covers a lot of things and the current redirect target is not an obvious one for a template using the name of the organisation. Template:Iso/doc is also a redirect.  McLerristarr  /  Mclay1  05:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as potentially confusing with other ISO standards. –Grondemar 04:57, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment – As creator, I have no objection to deleting. -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 02:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:RE



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. It should be noted, however, that at the time of the closure of this discussion, neither of these two redirects are in use in the article namespace.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * → Template:Reflist (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * → Template:Reflist (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete – old, unused redirects. "RE" could stand for anything and could be used incorrectly or could be used in the future as an abbreviation for something more obvious. Template talk:RE should also be deleted and Template talk:Re redirects there.  McLerristarr /  Mclay1  05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have notified involved editors. Bridgeplayer (talk) 10:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I designed Template:RE as "just a ), it's not a huge time-saver. If it's called via transclusion, then it is a time-saver, but I have a weak hunch that it's a bad idea to transclude a section header. SECOND: We'll never know how many people were using the template by transclusion, but since nobody has complained about its loss, I'll assume not many.  AGradman /  / talk 18:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Section headers are transcluded all the time - AfD and RfA are among the pages that use this technique. I am sorry that it took me so long, but I am here now to complain about the loss of the References header from this template, which is one of the things that distinguished it from reflist.  I considered just reverting Thumperward's changes to both and calling this discussion moot (as there would be no more redirect to discuss), but decided to take the high road and discuss here first.    —  Jeff G.  ツ  01:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * AfD and RfA are not in articlespace, and have a fixed and immutable format. The same doesn't apply for articles. It's confusing for an editor to click the edit section link and not have an obvious header presented on the subsection being edited. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 09:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * They're not supposed to be editing the References section (unless there are no External links and they want to add navboxes, cats, or interwiki links).   —  Jeff G.  ツ  02:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's entirely reasonable for people to be editing reference sections; for example, they may be adding a  argument to reflist, or the article may be using list-defined referencing. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'