Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 8

September 8
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 8, 2010

Pawl TV



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. —  ξ xplicit  07:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → Rickrolling (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Not mentioned in target. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete - promo for amateur webcast. Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, it is mentioned. Since it means nothing to me, I fail to see how it's a promo; I made the redirect when I was on a redirect creation spree one day. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 19:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per #8 under WP:REDIRECT: very obscure synonym for an article name VictorianMutant (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Pilate



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Pontius Pilate. —  ξ xplicit  07:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → Pilat (disambiguation) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Point Pilate to Pontius Pilate, which is the most common usage, as "What links here" shows. This should be very straightforward, but another user is determined to point it to Pilat (disambiguation) and I don't want to edit war.  Ja Ga  talk 20:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to Pontius Pilate per nom, easily the intended target of most searches. However, add a hatnote to that page linking back to Pilat (disambiguation) for anyone searching for something else.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pontius Pilate with hatnote - obvious; really. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pontius Pilate with hatnote to present target-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Pontius Pilate with hatnote, per above. bd2412  T 19:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Kings of England family tree



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. —  ξ xplicit  07:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * → English monarchs family tree (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This redirect should be deleted as it was only used in one article and could be confusing when searching for links to one of the family trees covering the Monarchs of the United Kingdom. Bill Oversixty (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - lack of links is irrelevant for a redirect. What is more significant is that it is a well-used redirect - 548 hits last month alone. Additionally, I see no reason why this is confusing since the target is likely to be useful to searchers. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep it's a plausible (and used) search term, so links are irrelevant, and the target article is appropriate for the search. Hut 8.5 16:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep-Very likely search term.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)