Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 April 27

April 27
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 27, 2011

Template:WPDinotopia



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per criterion G8 "pages dependent on a deleted page".Thryduulf (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * → Template:WikiProject Dinotopia (links to redirect • [ history] • )

The WikiProject this redirect is associated with was deleted and I just submitted the Template for deletion. There is no need to keep this redirect. Kumioko (talk) 23:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment wouldn't it get automatically deleted when the administrator who deletes the template examines the links for further deletion or detransclusion? 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Defer to TfD. Yes. If the template is deleted, the redirect will be speedily deleted (WP:CSD pages dependent on a deleted page). If the template is not deleted then the redirect should be kept. Thryduulf (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears that by having a RFD template on the redirect, it was not picked up, because it was not a redirect at the time the template was deleted. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 04:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * CSD deletion successful. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 06:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Benimámet, Valencia,



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 03:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * → Benimàmet, Valencia (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unnecessary redirect (with comma at end) PamD (talk) 21:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. This was originally an article created as a very short duplicate of Benimámet, Valencia that could have been deleted per CSD A10 instead of being redirected as this is not a logical search term. Thryduulf (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Crew Cuts



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep as is.  Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * → Crew cut (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Retargeting to a disambiguation page Crew Cuts. Newyorker2543 (talk) 18:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep as is because the hairstyle is far and away the most common usage on that list. In this case, the value of the redirect as a pluralization variant is higher than the value as a capitalization variant.  Add a hatnote to the crew cut page, however, to more clearly display that other uses exist.  (I'll do that now.)  Rossami (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Jack teh Rippor



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 17:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)


 * → Jack the Ripper (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. Two ridiculous but intentional typographical errors; nobody would ever type this by accident, and the minimal page statistics are explained most likely by the search pulldown. This in no way assists anyone in finding the target article. —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, asside from two (possibly duplicate) hits for what appears to be some sort of listing of progressive rock acts, this is the only google hit for the exact phrase so it's not a notable intentional misspelling of any sort. Thryduulf (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)