Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 August 22

August 22
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 22, 2011

Women's suffrage - Australia



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget per below consensus. --Taelus (talk) 14:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * → Women& (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]


 * Delete. not required, not a likely search term -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. At the time I created this redirect, Category:Women's suffrage in Australia lacked a main article, and the redirect was for purposes of category navigation rather than as a possible search term (it redirects to the Australia section of Women's suffrage, not generically to the article). Now that the main article exists (Women's suffrage in Australia), I have no problem deleting this redirect. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * (Making it point to Women's suffrage in Australia would also be an option.) Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Women's suffrage in Australia. Seems a perfectly plausible search term. Even if it wasn't the nomination doesn't cite any valid grounds for deletion. Harmless, so keep, and better target it. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Retarget per Bridgeplayer. This is used, between 10 and 30 hits a month, so it's not useless. Thryduulf (talk) 19:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.