Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 17

January 17
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 17, 2011

Copywrong



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * → Copyright misuse (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Unlikely search term. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * 'strong keep. This has been around since 2005 and gets 60-90 hits a month. copywrong -wikipedia gets 350,000+ ghits, 1,060 book results and 1,750 google scholar results. All this points to it being a very useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Thyrduulf's findings. Rossami (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep BUT change the redirect to Copyleft. More intelligent guess on what the user wants. ★Oliverlyc★  (My talk page here) 08:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually from looking at the results of the google searches, copyright misuse is much more likely to be what is being searched for, so I oppose retargetting but would not object to a hatnote. Thryduulf (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)