Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 June 4

June 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 4, 2011

Last surviving veteran of World War I



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedily deleted as the creation of a blocked user by nominator. Thryduulf (talk) 23:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Florence Green (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Redirect created by user who apparently wants to bypass the long-argued consensus to keep List of surviving veterans of World War I, so he can redirect that to this -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdraw that please - the creator has been blocked as a sock of a long-term disruptive editor, and I've speedied it as vandalism -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Haifax Disasters



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Hurricane Juan (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Halifax disasters could refer to more than 1 thing. (e.g. Halifax Explosion). EBE123 talkContribs 20:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Disambiguate. Write a disambiguation page at Halifax disasters and retarget this title there (or convert the redirect to a dab and move it, whichever you prefer). Thryduulf (talk) 23:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete bad typo for something that would more likely redirect to Halifax Explosion. Build a new dab at Halifax disaster . 184.144.168.112 (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Mass fast against black money



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete by User:PMDrive1061 with the reason created by a now-blocked user in violation of his mentorship.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → 2011 Indian protests against black money (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This is one of a very large number of redirects created pointing towards 2011 Indian protests against black money, and I don't see the point in most of them. They're unlikely to be useful as redirects - they're not things anyone would ever type in looking for this set of protests. I can't see most of them causing active harm besides for search clutter, but most of them just seem irredeemably useless. Besides the named nom, there's also a bunch more that I think can be discussed at the same time, which I've listed below. A couple of them might be salvageable as useful redirects, but due to the massive redundancy I have had a hard time guessing which ones - so I've just listed all the related redirects: 2011 satyagraha 2011 satyagraha against black money Baba Ramdev fast against black money Baba Ramdev hunger strike against black money Baba Ramdev protest's against black money Fast against black money Hunger strike against black money June 4, 2011 protests in India Mass fast against black money Protests against Indian black money Protests against black money in India Protests at Ramlila ground against black money Protests by Baba Ramdev Protests by Swami Ramdev Ramdev protest's against black money Kevin (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Since my original post, the creator of these redirects has been banned as a sockpuppet. Kevin (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all - The sock owner is now up for a community ban at WP:AN. The above redirects are part of a long, long sequence of abuse. - Sitush (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Sorry, I'm a bit daft. I thought this was about proposed redirects. These have all been redirected to appropriate articles. So, what are we discussing? Isn't this case closed? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No, redirects for discussion is about discussing existing redirects, specifically whether they should be deleted or retargeted. There is no central place to discuss proposed redirects as one isn't needed - either be bold and just create them or discuss it on the talk page of the intended target. Thryduulf (talk) 10:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Ruby peak (California)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (talk) 11:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Ruby Peak (California) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Created in error. See Ruby Peak (California) &#32;– droll  &#91;chat&#93;  05:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - It seems like a common sense redirect. A lower case word redirecting to and uppercase word is pretty standard. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Standard, so very useful. Thryduulf (talk) 08:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - That's fine with me. I learn something new everyday.&#32;– droll  &#91;chat&#93;  07:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Glomeremus orchidopilus



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (talk) 10:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Glomeremus orchidophilus (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete; misspelled Latin name. 112.202.31.91 (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep - plausible misspelling (by me at least). Unless that would mean we'd need thousands of the things, in which case it can go. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)