Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 May 11

May 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2011

Lis tof internet phenomenon



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 00:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * → List of Internet phenomena (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Older created implausible redirect. Albacore (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete per nominator. Thryduulf (talk) 02:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, multiple typos make it very implausible. Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 05:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Hyperoperation (group theory)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Unused unlikely orphaned redirect with hardly any page hits; will probably continue to be unused due to lengthy parenthesized title. May also cause confusion for our readers because of the target's ambiguousness with Hyperoperation as well. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  05:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Hyperstructure (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Keep. 20-30 hits a month is not "hardly any" and shows that it is in use which given the nature of the title suggests a link from an external site. I don't buy the confusion argument, given the parenthetical disambiguation is there to distinguish is from Hyperoperation. No good reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Thryduulf's arguments. And it's not exactly orphaned, either, given that it's linked in the disambiguation hatnote of Hyperoperation. 28bytes (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)