Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 May 28

May 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 28, 2011

Atidim Terminal



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Kiryat Atidim (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Incorrectly marked with Prod with the reason "Atidim Terminal is not mentioned anywhere on the Kiryat Atidim page nor does the reference on Kirtat Atidim page mention anything about Atidim Terminal.". Brought here as the correct discussion forum. Procedural nomination on which I have no view. TerriersFan (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Samuel Collins (1618-1710)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Samuel Collins (physician) (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Delete. As the page makes clear Samuel Collins (physician) is 1619-1670. It is another Samuel Collins that is 1618-1710, see Samuel Collins (physician). Tassedethe (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

List of parishes in Cebu (Phillippines)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. By the way, you can just use the speedy tag db-redirtypo in cases like this. Jafeluv (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → List of parishes in Cebu (links to redirect • [ history] • )

Someone started that article with a misspelled word in the article title. Requesting speedy deletion of the misspelled redirect title List of parishes in Cebu (Phillippines) soon. Zollerriia63 (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Economics/Old talk



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Economics (links to redirect • [ history] • )

This was apparently created directly as a redirect to Economics in 2002. While Talk:Economics/Old talk is a talk page archive, the mainspace redirect isn't needed. Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Slightly Stoopid (album)/old revert war



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * → Slightly Stoopid (links to redirect • [ history] • )
 * Appears to be detritus from a 2009 edit war, but I'm not certain. It doesn't fulfil any current role Thryduulf (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The edit war left some of the edit history in page Slightly $toopid, and I was called in to history-merge to tidy the mess. Slightly Stoopid (album)/old revert war is a record of the edit war: I had to put it in its own page to avoid messing up the history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The history doesn't seem to contain any GFDL-eligible content edits, just reverting back and forth. No attribution history will be lost if this is deleted. Jafeluv (talk) 12:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Frankenstein (false)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Frankenstein& (links to redirect • [ history] • )

An improbable search term - the redirect has had exactly 3 hits since 1 April. There is no history to it either. Thryduulf (talk) 10:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Public Access (film)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was No Action, would do better being listed at Requested Moves so that consensus can form. --Taelus (talk) 19:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * → Public Access (links to redirect • [ history] • )

To avoid confusion with Public access, wouldn't it make more sense for the redirect to be the other way around?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 02:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Restructure. I think that Public access (which redirects to Public-access television) should be a disambiguation page, which should contain all the hatnoted alternatives on the various articles and Public Access should redirect to that dab. The film should be at Public Access (film). Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me too.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 04:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: This discussion isn't really about the redirect, it's about the title of the article. The place for such discussions is Talk:Public Access, and the process is explained here. Jafeluv (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)