Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 November 11

November 11
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 11, 2011

Janni Lee Simner



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedied as R2 by User:Malik Shabazz


 * → WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Janni Lee Simner (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

A redirect from the mainspace to a draft article in the project space. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Currently the page doesn't exist, which is probably the way it should be as per WP:RED. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 02:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Move project draft over redirect without prejudice to an AfD discussion. I see no net WP:RED benefit in deletion when we have a workable stub already. Moving the draft to article space is the subject's best chance of getting attention. I am far from convinced as to notability but that can be resolved at AfD. Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IOUs



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. DrKiernan (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * → IOU (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

I don't think there should be redirects just for pluralized forms; article titles are usually singular and this does not fall into a class where they should be plural. Internally the only thing that linked here was Foreign-exchange_reserves which could just as easily, and now does, link as. Si Trew (talk) 14:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Google search throws out no search results linking to the redirect. Si Trew (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep as per WP:R reason #2. The target page contains the plural form, so it may be used in a wild and thus can be usable. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a standard . Thryduulf (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as a standard . Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.