Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 November 28

November 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 28, 2011

Washington Union High School District



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * → Washington Union School District (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Washington Union High School District is a high school district outside of Fresno, California. Washington Union School District is an elementary school district outside of Salinas, California. As they're completely unrelated districts, one should not redirect to the other.  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  20:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RED. If/when an article is written about the high school district the two articles should be linked via hatnotes. Thryduulf (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Enter your The Beauty Shop Memphis article name here



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Fastily. Thryduulf (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * → The Beauty Shop Memphis (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Unusual redirect page name, who would search for this? silly billypiggy ''¡SIGN NOW OR ELSE! 18:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD and WP:CSD. Tagged as such. Thryduulf (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heather Lynch (disambiguation)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * → Heather Lynch (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

"Disambiguation page" created with just 1 entry to a fictional character's maiden name (I think that's why it changed...). I moved the page to function as a proper redirect. I think this was a preemptively created disambiguation, but there's no dab page. It's currently a redirect (and by MOSDAB policy it can't be anything else), that's why it's here. Shadowjams (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pages with (disambiguation) in the title should not redirect to an article. In retrospect the dab should have been deleted under WP:CSD with a new redirect created to replace it. The page moving has just confused things. I feel this should be a speedy candidate but since it is not really a dab pages G6 criteria doesn't fit. Perhaps WP:CSD? France 3470   ( talk ) 15:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You're absolutely right. I don't know why I didn't think of that in the first place. Shadowjams (talk) 20:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete is itself now a redirect to Heather Stevens, so we don't have any Heather Lynches let alone a dab-page worth. Thryduulf (talk) 15:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep retarget to Heather Stevens, as this redirect actually show a non-evident but valid entry for a possible future DAB. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't keep disambiguation pages because they might serve a purpose in the future. If they are not valid and cannot be redirected to a pre-exisiting dab they are deleted on the basis that they are not serving to navigate. Therefore, I do not see why we should keep a redirect which rather falsely suggests that there is something to disambiguate when this is simply not the case. If such a dab is needed in the future it can be recreated without prejudice. France 3470   ( talk ) 19:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The Heather Stevens target is unlikely to be guessed by someone writing about the third Heather Lynch (after the second one overwrites Heather Lynch, so this redirect will possibly aid. It's a weak reason, but this solution is space-efficient for Wikipedia hosting and there's no good reason to delete this. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: I don't think we need a redirect to a redirect, nor an empty disambiguation page. I don't think I understand what Dmitrij D. Czarkoff is saying, but if it's that someday someone might create a disambiguation page, then that's not a valid reason for keeping it - they can create such a page at that time. MsBatfish (talk) 08:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Facebook +



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, G4.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 00:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * → Facebook (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

I can't find any record of a Facebook+ or Facebook Plus, beyond this joke article. In theory this redirect is fairly harmless, but from its history it looks like it was created to advertise some unofficial thing created by other people, although god knows what exactly it is. Yaksar (let's chat) 00:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'd have tagged the first version for speedy deletion per WP:CSD, it might have met WP:CSD too. As it stands, it's not an implausible redirect, so it isn't subject to R3. Thryduulf (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I already tagged this (and it was deleted as such) as a hoax once already. MikeWazowski (talk) 01:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I also previously tagged it as spam/hoax. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - actually the wrong move was to make it a redirect. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy close? &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.