Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 October 15

October 15
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 15, 2011

Open 50



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * → International Monohull Open Classes Association (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Title does not have anything to do with the text in the article it redirects to.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  09:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RED. This is a sailing racing class on which we could do with an article. Reference to it was removed from the target here and there is no other sensible retarget. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Primarily because it's not discussed at all at the target and also because I'll bet Bridgeplayer is right and that is notable enough for its own article and that a red link might help with that. — m a k o ๛  18:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per arguments above. A redlink would be better to encourage article creation. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:FUR



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was screw it. Looking further about how this template is used, I'm going to just be bold like I should have been in the first place.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * → Non-free content review (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

For a well-established (5.5 years) project redirect, this deserves a full discussion about where it needs to point, since I don't want to tinker and have this turn into bad blood. Basically, WP:FUR currently points at Non-free content review, which I believe derives from "fair use review". However, I have found that the term "FUR" as such around here more often refers to non-free use rationales, aka "fair use rationales". Therefore I believe that this redirect should point at Non-free use rationale guideline instead of what it points to now. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.