Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 April 12

April 12
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 12, 2012

WWM



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Concurrency (road) (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Redirect that's an unused abbreviation for "wrong-way multiplex" which is a neologism. Neither the neologism nor the abbreviation are used in the target article (the better term based on reliable sources is "wrong-way concurrency") nor does a Google search turn up the WWM abbreviation as connected to the neologism. (Rather, it turns up several search terms and even a company's stock ticker, and those terms don't have articles.)  Imzadi 1979  →   19:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * yep, there should be a "WWM" page, as there is one for ABC or CDA... - 84.227.76.140 (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything notable that uses this abbreviations. Someone can create it when there is something. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  19:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Acronym Finder returns, among others,
 * "Wigner-Weyl-Moyal" a theory in quantum mechanics which is alluded to in Wigner quasi-probability distribution but not directly discussed
 * "Waste water management", a concept discussed at Sewage treatment
 * "Woven wire mesh" which is described in other words at Chain-link fencing
 * "Widowed White Male", a parallel to SWF described here
 * "Working With Men", a UK-based charity which does not appear to have a Wikipedia article yet
 * and some others that appear less notable. (Even by their loose standards, though, there's no listing for "wrong-way multiplex".)  I think there is probably enough to support a disambiguation page but have no strong opinion about the contents.  Rossami (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

西山朝



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Tay Son dynasty (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

I don't see that this one is helpful, but decided that the speedy probably wouldn't apply here. Calabe1992 19:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep 西山朝 was the official written name of Tây Sơn Dynasty. 梁棚元 (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete non-English characters, this redirects will never be typed English. ༆ (talk) 19:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If non-English letters are never typed, why are so many European articles at names that are not English? 70.24.248.211 (talk) 06:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "༆", is that supposed to be intentionally ironic? --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 14:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as the native name and therefore plausible synonym of the Tay Son Dynasty.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep original language name of the topic, therefore likely to be used for searching for it. 70.24.248.211 (talk) 06:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Some users of the English Wikipedia do use alternate keyboards.  More importantly, however, many of us use copy-paste to look for concepts we don't recognize.  As long as the title is not confusing or actively harmful, the redirect is allowed.  Rossami (talk) 04:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is no specific policy prohibiting non-English or non-Latin redirects. I'm too lazy to look for the past discussion myself, but I remember CaliforniaAliBaba mentioning that within the days following the death of Roh Moo-hyun, the search hits on the English Wikipedia for his name in Hangul skyrocketed. Non-English redirects do not disrupt Wikipedia, and deletion somewhat harms the project if you think about it. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 14:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

====Dante And Randal And Jay And Silent Bob And A Bunch Of New Characters And Lando, Take Part In A Whole Bunch Of Movie Parodies Including But Not Exclusive To, The Bad News Bears, The Last Starfighter, IN Jones And The Temple Of Doom, Plus A High Scho ==== 


 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete as completely useless and improbable. ··· 日本穣 ? ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 07:27, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Clerks: The Animated Series (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This redirect was created by a malfunctioning "US state abbreviations" bot abbreviating "Indiana Jones" to "IN Jones" in the page title Dante And Randal And Jay And Silent Bob And A Bunch Of New Characters And Lando, Take Part In A Whole Bunch Of Movie Parodies Including But Not Exclusive To, The Bad News Bears, The Last Starfighter, Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom, Plus A High Scho, which has long since been moved to a more sane name and deleted. As this is equally unintelligible and has no chance of being searched due to the bot-introduced IN abbreviation, it isn't necesssary. Gurch (talk) 13:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.