Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 April 8

April 8
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 8, 2012

Template:Infobox Polish Soldiers



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Template:Infobox military person (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Unused and orphan. It uses plurar instead of singular. Infobox military person is well established not needing unneccessary redirects. Magioladitis (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Just a friendly remark from the original author. The Infobox PS was one of the first infoboxes and predates the infobox it currently redirects to by two years. It's neither used nor needed any more though and could be safely deleted.  // Halibutt 19:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Close discussion, and move to Templates for Deletion based on Halbutt's comment above. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  14:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The infobox served a great purpose back then but now it's obsolete exactly as Halbutt suggests. We don't need a template or redirect with this name anymore. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Nasdaq2



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Template:NASDAQ (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Orphan in mainspace. We have Nasdaq as a valid redirect. Additional "2" is unneccessary. Magioladitis (talk) 13:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Not orphaned - the nominator removed it just before opening this discussion. I will undo these edits shortly. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 15:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not needed. The bit about being orphaned is a red herring; the template has no purpose to exist. Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reason to keep redirects that are more complicated than the original templates. -- nips (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Bypass redirects and delete + trout nominator for orphaning it before this discussion Bulwersator (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Check similar discussions in: Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_22, Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_24, Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_24, Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_24, Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_April_4, Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_April_8 which also resulted in deletion. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Tooshort 2



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * → Template:Lead too short (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

We have tooshort as a valid redirect. This one contains an unnuccessary 2. No need to keep it. Magioladitis (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reason to keep redirects that are more complicated than the original templates. -- nips (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.