Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 June 9

June 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 9, 2012

Computer zealotry



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Operating system advocacy. Thryduulf (talk) 15:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * → Fan (person) (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Nearly orphaned. Only incoming article link is from Operating system advocacy, which is also the only target that would really fit. Don Cuan (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * keep per the top of this page "Note: Redirects should not be deleted simply because they do not have any incoming links. Please do not list this as a reason to delete a redirect. Redirects that do have incoming links are sometimes deleted as well, so it's not a necessary condition either. See When should we delete a redirect?". And this one doesn't even have no incoming links. Tideflat (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This is not the reason why I nominated it. That redirect pointed to Fanboy, first as a separate entry, now as a section of Fan (person). This target is completely inappropriate though. Operating system advocacy comes closest, but still doesn't cut it. And being the only article that actually uses the redirect, it would result in a circular redirect. Better to get rid of it. Don Cuan (talk) 07:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Other than resulting in a circular redirect, what's wrong with operating system advocacy as a target? – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Retarget per Arms and Hearts, and remove the link to here at the target article. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  05:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

APTX 4869



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to List of fictional toxins. Ruslik_ Zero  18:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * → Jimmy Kudo (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

There is no such section as "APTX 4869" in Jimmy Kudo. Despite I went through some articles related to Case Closed, no where explicitly deal with this subject. Quest for Truth (talk) 10:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Re-anchor- Back to List of fictional toxins, which is what it is, where it's already appropriately covered, and has been before. Dru of Id (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, I've added to the Fictional poisons section of the target so the existing redirect again works. Thryduulf (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.