Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 May 28

May 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 28, 2012

Red Lipstick (album)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 18:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * → Lady Gaga (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

There is not reason for this redirected article to exist. There is no confirmation that her next album is called Red Lipstick and is completely fabricated. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 18:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nothing to confirm that "Red Lipstick" is the title. There is a YouTube video that hints "Possible demo snippet of " Red Lipstick" Gaga's song off her upcoming fourth album", but this can't be absolutely certain. Aside from this, zero sources. SwisterTwister   talk  01:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boys' schhool of st. pauls'



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_ Zero 18:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * → St. Paul& (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Shouldn't this be deleted? WP:R is only really for common misspellings, not gibberish. :) OrbiterSpacethingy (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete- Created (accidently, I presume) by the initial editor, no substantive editing here, routine housekeeping. Dru of Id (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's been around since 2007 without creating any confusion or controversy. The title was created as fork of an existing article - probably inadvertently.  The redirect was used to point the editor to the correct title where his contributions would be more appreciated (and his spelling corrected).  That is a legitimate use of a redirect so, no, redirects are not merely for "common misspellings".  This particular redirect is not especially helpful but neither is it harmful.  Weak keep because there's no actual reason to delete.  (Tag with unprintworthy, though.)  Rossami (talk) 01:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I've added the tag. The only reason I wanted this removed was because it appears rather prominently when searching for "boys s...", and looks very silly. OrbiterSpacethingy (talk) 07:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Unprintworthy should remove it from the search results, though it may take a week or so for the index to refresh. Thanks.  Rossami (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's handy. Thank you! OrbiterSpacethingy (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.