Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 November 27

November 27
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 27, 2012

MAAS



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Maas. Ruslik_ Zero 19:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * → Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Unclear why this should be a redirect; "MAAS" does not appear in the article Qwertyus (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I had created it based off of their Master of Arts in Arab Studies program (MAAS).  MBisanz  talk 20:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd call that NE. Qwertyus (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Okey, I'm good with re-targeting then.  MBisanz  talk 15:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Maas. Anything with that acronym could easily be accommodated there. Simply south...... wearing fish for just 6 years 20:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Qwertyus (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * retarget per Simply South. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Photographs of the Xunantunich ruins (1)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * → Xunantunich (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Delete as although this has some history it was a gallery page and it is unlikely people are going to look it up. Simply south...... wearing fish for just 6 years 18:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3 CD Collector's Set (Rihanna album)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_ Zero 19:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * → Rihanna discography (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Per comments at User talk:Mark Arsten: is this needed to preserve links from outside and avoid recreation of the article, or should this be completely deleted? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per the comments on User talk:Mark Arsten as an unlikely search item/unnecessary redirect. Also recommending WP:SALT for prevention of recreation. Till 12:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Re-creating a redirect of a deleted article with the intention of protecting the redirected from being edited (Status' reason) simply illogical and unnecessary. It may as well not exist at all. AARON &bull; TALK   12:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep at least for now, as it's not doing any harm as a redirect. The stats also show that this is well used, but as it's been through so many AfDs and a DRV those figures are going to be massively inflated, but it's not possible to know how many it's getting outside of this so I suggest re-evaluating a few months after this RfD if anybody wants. Thryduulf (talk) 13:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per the comment by Thryduulf. — Tomíca (T2ME) 14:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Just in case my nomination is taken as a delete !vote. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - useful for navigation, plausibly linked from outside Wikipedia. Someone looking for an entry on this album should be sent to the diskography, not given the finger. Wily D  14:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep is obvious. Statυs  ( talk ) 14:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Might as well, there's that chance that someone could type that in, looking for the article, and noticing that it is now a redirect. TBrandley 19:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TIE Fighter Boats



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * → Dark Empire (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This redirect goes to a very long description of the plot of some Star Wars comic book series. There is no obvious reference to "Tie fighter boats" that I can see. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Most trivial and trivia; subject wouldn't even be appropriate for coverage at TIE fighter. --EEMIV (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, since there's no information about it anywhere (and probably shouldn't be). According to http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/TIE_fighter_boat it was used in two books relating to Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game (West End Games). TimBentley (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Trivial, not even a proper redirect. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 14:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.