Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 15

April 15
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 15, 2013

Domestic Violence in Chile



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943  (talk) 05:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * → Domestic violence in Chile (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This redirect was created during a mistaken move of an article out of sandbox space to article space; all significant contents were written by one author and same author performed the merge to Domestic violence in Chile - I don't think we need this redirect anymore as the capital "V" is not standard. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Harmless . Thryduulf (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Most of our readers don't know that the "V" isn't standard. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Irish national media



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Media of Ireland ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 06:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * → Media of the Republic of Ireland (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Irish media redirects to Media of Ireland, while this one redirects to Media of the Republic of Ireland - there are no extant links to this redirect, and it's not a common framing, so to avoid confusion between the two it is better off to just delete this one. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 21:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Media of Ireland. It's a plausible search term so it's worthwhile keeping it, but it's better to target it at the page covering both political entities on the island rather than just one as it's fairly ambiguous between media covering the whole island, media covering the whole RoI and Irish Nationalist media from either side of the border. Thryduulf (talk) 00:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Media of Ireland per Thryduulf  -- Lenticel  ( talk ) 00:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Allow me to point out that Media of Ireland covers all media on the Island of Ireland. The *country* of Ireland is found at Media of the Republic of Ireland - so sending something "national" to the article about the "island" doesn't make sense to me.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If we were certain that a user searching for this term meant national in the context of "covering the whole Republic of Ireland" then yes, that target would be better. However, as I note above the term is ambiguous between that and other uses. Thryduulf (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I must admit that I know little about the geopolitics of Ireland. How about a dab between the two links instead? That would cover the general geopolitical entity while catering to the more with the more specific one.-- Lenticel  ( talk ) 03:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Media of Ireland - print and broadcast media tend to reach throughout the island. Brocach (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Radoslav Illo



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * → 2010 World Junior Ice Hockey Championships rosters (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Redirects to an unlikely page which is just a roster list for a team. Better served by being a red link as the player may end up meeting WP:NHOCKEY in the near future. DJSasso (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. At the moment they are not notable, and so we do not want to encourage the writing of an article about them. That they may become notable in future is WP:CRYSTAL, and if they do then the redirect can just be overwritten by an article without the need for deletion that will inconvenience those who use the redirect (53 hits last month for example). Thryduulf (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem is that the redirect doesn't redirect to a plausible target that has any information on him. To randomly redirect the user to a team he played on in one tournament 3 years ago inconveniences the reader as there are other targets that are as reasonable or more resonable to redirect to (though they too lack information about the subject). Redirects are only supposed to link to pages where there is reasonable information on the subject. That isn't the case here. This redirect existing is if anything likely to cause an article not to be created when he is notable. -DJSasso (talk) 11:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This tournament seems to be insignificant to his career. He's got a page at the Anaheim Ducks website (http://ducks.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475261) which doesn't even consider it worth mentioning. However, I'm open to other targets. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as we are bordering on the WP:CRYSTAL side of things here. When he becomes notable then we should create a proper article.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pendenadil doltrate



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 08:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * → Little Fockers (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Delete as obscure, unverifiable name. According to the Sustengo article, this was a generic name for the fictional drug. I've redirected that article to the film it was mentioned in, and fixed the double redirect, and would have added the name to the film's article but I can't verify it with anything that isn't sourced from Wikipedia. Peter&#160;James (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Obscure and a very unlikely search term. --BDD (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dalupiri Island: The Municipality of San Antonio, Northern Samar



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 06:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * → San Antonio, Northern Samar (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Delete this redirect because it is an improbable search string. Moreover, the redirect Dalupiri Island already exists. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Despite being the location of the page for only a couple of days in September last year this continues to get 10-20 hits each month, suggesting it is linked from somewhere. Deletion of this harmless redirect would inconvenience these users while bringing no benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 21:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep unwieldy but plausible redirect.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.