Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 August 9

August 9
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 9, 2013.

Kakapoopoopeepeemeyer



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * → Family Guy (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Foolish redirect. Beerest355 Talk 20:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * keep see this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tideflat (talk • contribs) 20:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The redirect still makes no sense. The quote is not even the same, and there is no reason that it should redirect to the main article. Beerest355 Talk 20:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with Beerest355. Delete as nonsensical. Nobody would ever attempt to search this, much less spell it exactly the same way. If someone wants to search for Family Guy, (s)he would not search some absurdly random quote (which, I might add, is not even very well-known or significant to the series) in the hopes of it having its own article or even its own section of a Family Guy–related article. Keeping a redirect like this is simply pointless.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 01:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Obscure reference – unlikely to be useful. –  Paine Ellsworth   C LIMAX ! 10:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since it doesn't appear in the target and is thus misleading to the reader in the highly remote eventuality of it being used as a search term. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Juggy Broadleteen



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * → Justin Bieber (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Not mentioned at target article – no reason for it to redirect. Is this a joke I don't get? Beerest355 Talk 20:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: I bet the redirect was probably just someone's little prank to find yet another way to make fun of the kid. Even if it is a reference of some sort, it is nonsensical.&emsp;&mdash;  | J  ~  Pæst  | &#8202; 01:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is just one of many mocking parodies. Does not appear to be popular, so it's still more of a vandal redirect. –   Paine Ellsworth   C LIMAX ! 09:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I just nominated two more by this same semi-active contributor – please see above. –  Paine Ellsworth   C LIMAX ! 10:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since it doesn't appear in the target and has seemingly been created to disparage the subject. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.