Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 25

February 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 25, 2013

Christian Taliban (disambiguation)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete.  Wizardman  18:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * → Christian Fundamentalism (disambiguation) (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]
 * → Christian Fundamentalism (disambiguation) (links to redirect • [ history] • )    [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This pejorative term is not discussed at the target, nor at any of the articles linked from the target page. There is evidence of some minor use of this term on the Internet, and pejorative redirects may be allowed if they are likely to be searched, but it doesn't appear to be a really likely search term, and without any discussion of the term it's just an empty pejorative used by some opponents of Christian fundamentalism. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I added Christian Taliban to the nomination. I haven't considered whether these are plausible redirects. TimBentley (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete-Nom pretty much nailed it. If the term were discussed somewhere (with sourcing), that would be one thing, but absent that its just an insult/mocking. --Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Retarget "Christian Taliban" to Christofascism, delete the other one. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * delete It's just a slang pejorative for supposedly intolerant right-wing Christians. Christian fundamentalism is an inappropriate target because the latter is a particular theological position, not necessarily a political camp; Christofascism is just another pejorative cooked up by certain liberal Christians, and I don't see the evidence that they are connected other than in being pejorative. Maybe there's some article about politics that could be a target, but fundamentalism definitely isn't it. Mangoe (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heer
, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 March 29

Hoopy Entertainment



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget  to Attack Retrieve Capture Nabla (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * → PopCap Games (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

I don't think the target is warranted here. The connection between Hoopy and PopCap is tenouos. I suggest some other ideas:
 * Target to Pogo.com, since the rights to its best-known game were bought by Total Entertainment Network which later became Pogo
 * Target to Attack Retrieve Capture, which appears to be the only game marketed under this name
 * Some other target? Ego White Tray (talk) 04:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Attack Retrieve Capture as that seems to be the only page on Wikipedia that uses the term. If content is added elsewhere at a later date it can be retargetted again or a hatnote added. Thryduulf (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.