Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 January 10

January 10
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 10, 2013

Whittingstall's



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Retarget to Sedgwick's Brewery. Ruslik_ Zero 18:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * → Langleybury (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Pointless - leads to a paragraph about a Whittingstall owning a house, nothing appropriate to this redirect. Possibly there was originally something about a brewery of that name, but there's nothing to connect it now. Pam D  22:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment there is a bit of content about a Whittingstall's Brewery at Sedgwick's Brewery that is worth considering as a target, although there isn't much there. Thryduulf (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sakine Cansiz



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Removed. [Article was created over it after nom.] — WylieCoyote 17:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * → Kurdistan Workers& (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Delete. Should be a red link until the biography is written. No info at current target. Pjacobi (talk) 12:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think it would be a notable article, regardless. — WylieCoyote 15:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait--you don't think that the co-founder of the PKK is notable? I'm about to turn this into an article so we can close this discussion. Drmies (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I mean--seriously. Someone close this immediately, please, so we can pull that ugly template from an obviously important article. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * yes this template is ridiculous, a co-founder of the PKK, the first senior female in the group.-Kiwipat (talk) 17:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Morning After (Tankard album)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. Non-admin closure. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * → Tankard (band) (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Now a redirect for a non-notable album by a barely notable band--a very unlikely search term. One goes to the band first. Drmies (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - non-notable albums by notable bands should be redirects to the bands. One of the most straightforwardly obvious cases one can imagine. Wily D  08:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - the band is obviously notable, a simple search can prove it, check allmusic.com article . Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per WilyD. Just because the band is notable does not mean that all their works are too. Thryduulf (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't understand. There's a "delete" whose argument is that the band is notable, and a "keep" that argues that the album is not. And I don't see why "non-notable albums by notable bands should be redirects to the bands": if the set of words is a likely search term, sure--but that's not what we have here, in my opinion. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The standard isn't likely' search term, it's plausible search term, and for an excellent reason: unlikely but plausible search terms get used by a non-trivial number of people, and there's no reason to fuck them over. Especially when deletion doesn't benefit the encyclopaedia in any manner.  I don't know if this is a likely search term or not (either claim is plausible), but it's clearly a plausible search term. Wily D  16:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elster Purzler

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * → Old German Magpie Tumbler (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Incorrectly named, German name is Elsterpurzler (see EE No. D/828) --PigeonIP (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very likely misspelling. Thryduulf (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Thryduulf. Whatever "it" is, it looks like a compound noun; one could even add the hyphenated version as a redirect. Drmies (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very likely misspelling for Elsterpurzler. English speakers tend to uncompound words. Dree12 (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.