Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 May 10

May 10
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 10, 2013

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frané Lessac



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep These redirects fall under the aegis of WP:AfC, and have been kept for ages. No harm. ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 17:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → Frané Lessac (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Delete. Was accepted and created in MAIN: Gmt2001 (talk) 23:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Administratively close and defer the general decision to delete or keep leftover redirects from WP:AFC in the hands of that WikiProject. In other words, if there is nothing special about THIS redirect, there is no point in discussing it here.  WP:COI disclaimer:  I am an active participant in that WikiProject and have a clear bias towards keeping this decision in the hands of that WikiProject.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  01:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Let the wikiproject decide and leaning towards keep. There are some stale never-reviewed articles that have been abandoned but are good enough for article space, and in case these editors come back, I'd rather them see that there article is live than see a "this page has been deleted" message. Ego White Tray (talk) 02:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Benson Gumball Machine



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk)


 * → List of Regular Show characters (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Overlap with Benson (Regular Show), manual of style Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 17:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC) I honestly cannot make heads or tails of the above conversation. , are you saying it should be deleted because there are two redirects to similar but different targets? I don't understand what is being suggested. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 17:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * We often have multiple different redirects to the same thing, because different people type in different stuff when they're searching - there being an overlap between two redirects isn't a problem. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Then I guess the real issue I'm having is the name, most show characters have their names followed by the show title, this I can't imagine anyone looking for, unlike Benson (Regular Show), which already exists. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 00:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It gets a reasonable number of page hits - see http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Benson_Gumball_Machine (though it's not clear how many of those have been part of the article's development before it was redirected) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the confusion but that's exctly what I'm suggesting. The (Regular Show) redirect fill the same purpose as the "Gumball machine" one, but is in line with the manual of style for character redirects by having the show name and not just a description. I can't see the need for multiple redirects, and I feel this one is more appropriate to delete. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 23:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Firstly, the two redirects do not "fill the same purpose", as they direct to two different articles (a fact that I missed initially). Secondly, MOS article title standards do not apply to redirects and we are not restricted to any specific formats - in fact, one widespread use of redirects is specifically for non-standard alternatives that people may search for. I really see no valid reason for deletion presented here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The WAV.s



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete Uncontested nomination ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 17:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → I Like How It Feels (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

A page for the artists/producers The WAV.s does NOT exist. Its been redirected the Enrique Iglesias song "I Like How it Feels" yet this seems to be completely arbitrary as The WAV.s are featured on several songs including Kelly Rowland's "Down for Whatever" &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  16:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Superior Lalazar Public School and College Thana Malakand



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted' by Jimfbleak under criteria G2 and A10 (although neither apply, G6 does). Thryduulf (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → Superior Lalazar Public School and College Thana Malakand (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Article was created in template space. Apparently the redirect resulting from moving it cannot be speedied. —teb728 t c 02:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure who told you that, but redirects that result from moving pages created in the wrong namespace are subject to G6 per an explicit talk page consensus a few months back. ] speedied this under incorrect criteria [[WP:CSD#A10|A10 (applies to the article namespace only) and G2 (applies to test pages only). Thryduulf (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.