Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 May 5

May 5
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 5, 2013

Brutistanti



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 15:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → Protestantism (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This appears to be a foreign language. I think it may be an Arabic transliteration? JFH (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete vague redirect. Google books and google scholar did not turn any useful leads.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment No results from Google that talk about it that I could find. The Free dictionary does redirect to Protestantism but they may just be pulling data from Wikipedia. However it is getting about 7 hits per month so it is being used by some people. Tideflat (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Josip Sabolić



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Delete Uncontested ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 15:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → Cascade Plaza (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

WP:PROD of a WP:BLP based on "no significant coverage to demonstrate notability" declined by redirecting to one of his projects - which in turn barely mentions him and may not be notable in and of itself. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 08:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 
 * → Cascade Plaza (links to redirect • [ history] • )    [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 00:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Integrated Information Theory (IIT)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Keep ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 15:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * → Integrated Information Theory (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Redirect should be deleted. It is just a left-over from a page move due to the original title having a redundant abbreviation definition appended in the title. BarrelProof (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I follow all this, but think I agree. I believe the final result should be a page called "Integrated Information Theory", and none with the (IIT) at the end of the title, not even a redirect from it.DavidHobby (talk) 21:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article was at the title with "(ITT)" at the end for just under 2 years between creation in May 2010 and being moved in April 2012. In the year since it was moved, the redirect has been getting 200-400 hits each month (huge numbers for a redirect, very strongly suggesting incoming external links). The redirect should be marked as unprintworthy but it is otherwise completely harmless. Deletion would inconvenience hundreds of people each month and as such would be distinctly harmful to the project. Thryduulf (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Thryduulf. This is an old redirect getting plenty of hits; keeping it is completely harmless, while deleting it would not be. Sideways713 (talk) 08:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.