Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 12

October 12
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 12, 2013.

Directed_Electronics
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 24%23Directed Electronics

Tony Acworth



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. WJBscribe (talk) 22:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)


 * → Skunk Fu! (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Non-notable, redirects to show he's part of, no need for a redirect on someone non-notable to a show. Redirects aren't created for every member of a show. Caffeyw (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 
 * Keep It is harmless and he is mentioned at the target. Your argument of "no need for a redirect on someone non-notable to a show" is superfluous as we do that all the time.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 12:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - harmless, potentially useful, no grounds of WP:RFD are met - what's to delete about it? The Whispering Wind (talk) 02:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete According to IMDB, he was also involved with Kid vs. Kat and Joseph: King of Dreams. While he isn't currently mentioned on those pages, I don't like the idea of arbitrarily redirecting a non-notable person to one of several notable projects he's associated with. If there were some sort of indication that he's primarily known for Skunk Fu!, it might be ok as a sort of WP:BLP1E thing. --BDD (talk) 21:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * He worked as an unremarkable animator for those two projects. As he was an actor in Skunk Fu! it's probably best to point him there.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 16:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:BDD. Ruslik_ Zero 18:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Whispering Wind (talk) 21:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, the target has the most information on the topic. Siuenti (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Current computer and video game events
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 28%23Current computer and video game events

Bach (programming language)
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 24%23Bach (programming language)

Lufthansa Flight 4043



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was re-establish the article with the agreement of the nominator and no contrary views. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 19:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * → Lufthansa (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

This redirect should be deleted because it is pointless. At Lufthansa (nor at any other section of the Lufthansa article), nothing is said about this incident. This is in accordance with WP:AIRCRASH, according to which the Lufthansa Flight 4043 is considered a non-event which should not be included in any Wikipedia article. FoxyOrange (talk) 09:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Re-establish the article. What happened was that an editor took an article and made this redirect. Such bold redirects are absolutely fine because the content remains in the history. However, if we delete this redirect then we are, in effect, deleting the article by proxy, without consideration of the article's merit. It may well be that the subject is not notable but that should be decided through a PROD or AFD which no doubt will happen immediately after recreation. The Whispering Wind (talk) 17:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, done as suggested. This RfD can therefore be closed.--FoxyOrange (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.