Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 4

February 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 4, 2014.

Kinetite



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was moot redirect replaced with an article. Thryduulf (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Kinetite → Fireball (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

What looks to be a meaningless term that has lost the base of its redirect from an original discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Kinetite. Seems like its time has come unless someone can find an authoritative reference, and give meaning to an otherwise non-encyclopaedic word — billinghurst  sDrewth  09:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * There are two uses of the word "Kinetite" that I've been able to find.
 * One is a term used in the Star Wars universe for a ball of energy used as a weapon, "Fireball" is not an unreasonable approximation of this. It seems this is not used outside that context and its lack of mention in any of the Wikipedia articles about that franchise suggests it is not notable enough for our purposes.
 * Completely independently of that, in the 1880s there was an explosive going by the name of "Kinetite" which appears notable from what I've managed to find . I'll have a go at writing a stub about it shortly. Thryduulf (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Stub written. I've written a stub article about the explosive, replacing the redirect, so this is no longer within the scope of RfD. Anyone is free to nominate it at AfD if they desire. Thryduulf (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Dos! (Green Day album)



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was Speedy delete.] Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Dos! (Green Day album) → ¡Dos! (links to redirect • [ history] • )     [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]

Created from a move, isn't recent so doesn't pass CSD. Maybe IAR here? buffbills7701 01:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * No need to bring such redirects to RFD, just tag them with (see WP:MFD's "Pages in the wrong namespace" sentence). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 04:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete housekeeping. -- 70.50.148.248 (talk) 06:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.