Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 January 21

January 21
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 21, 2014.

Official Conspiracy Theory
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 January 29%23Official Conspiracy Theory

Draft space



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:CNR, created December 2013. Mediawiki did not invent this concept.. It existed long before wikis, and mediawiki wasnt the first wiki to have the feature either. John Vandenberg (chat) 17:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Draft space → Wikipedia:Drafts (links to redirect • [ history] • )    [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]
 * Delete per nom. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:OfferHelp



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 10:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Not used, housekeeping Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 00:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Template:OfferHelp → Template:Offer help (links to redirect • [ history] • )    [ Closure: [ keep]/[ delete] ]
 * Comment why housekeeping this template redirect? There are a lot of template redirects like this, removing spaces and changing capitalisation, which callers use to invoke the template more readily.  Many of them are unused. John Vandenberg (chat) 01:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep redirects don't have to be linked to to exist; what housekeeping reason for this deletion are you using? Many templates use camelcased redirects, many templates exist at camelcased names. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 04:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously. A very likely mistake. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - plausibletypo, no rationale for deletion. Wily D 09:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep – these are similar titles, and mistakes are made, which can result in the usage of this template. Epicgenius (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.