Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 5

December 5
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 5, 2015.

Von Teese, Dita



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ssт✈(discuss) 07:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Von Teese, Dita → Dita Von Teese (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Von_Teese,_Dita&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely redirect: Not generally known by surname first. Slashme (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as an R from sort name. These are useful for sorting purposes and when searching by surname. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tavix -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep people do search in the manner, and peoples names do appear in this manner -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tavix. Rossami (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HashtagSwaggyC



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 00:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * HashtagSwaggyC → Colby Burnett (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HashtagSwaggyC&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely variant spelling of nickname. Slashme (talk) 22:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Roland Corporation



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ssт✈(discuss) 07:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The Roland Corporation → Roland Corporation (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Roland_Corporation&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely redirect: I don't think it was widely known as "The" Roland Corporation. Slashme (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if it wasn't widely known that way, it's still a likely search term. FWIW, the lede of Roland Corporation uses the "the." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavix (talk • contribs) 02:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plausible redirect that has no potential for confusion and violates no policy.  Rossami (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Walking Dead: Michonne - A Telltale Games Mini-Series



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 00:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The Walking Dead: Michonne - A Telltale Games Mini-Series → The Walking Dead: Season Two (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Walking_Dead:_Michonne_-_A_Telltale_Games_Mini-Series&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

unnecessary redirect - the "A Telltale Games Mini-series" is a subtitle that is rarely included in the name given by Telltale or the media, and the game, once it has a page, will be at "The Walking Dead: Michonne" (no disamb needed). M ASEM (t) 17:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete with nom's rationale. czar  06:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I find it kind off funny. I find it kind off sad



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Speedily deleted under multiple criteria including block evasion of the editor who created it and that it's an implausible redirect. The lyric isn't even spelled right using "off" instead of "of" and many cite it as being "kinda" altogether. Mkdw talk 22:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I find it kind off funny. I find it kind off sad → Mad World (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_find_it_kind_off_funny._I_find_it_kind_off_sad&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Target unrelated to title except perhaps as the creator's opinion —teb728 t c 07:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It's the song's chorus. Valid search term people could use Brustopher (talk) 12:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Is there a way (like maybe a R from chorus template) to indicate such a thing on the redirect page? —teb728 t c 12:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * R from quotation is probably the closest thing we have. Without prejudice to this discussion, I tagged it. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete not mentioned in the target article and has multiple typos in it. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete given it's typo'd (it's "of" funny and "of" sad) └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mahoganier



 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 00:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Mahoganier → Mahogany (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahoganier&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Mahoganyish → Mahogany (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahoganyish&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]


 * Mahoganish → Mahogany (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahoganish&action=history history] · stats)     [ Closure:  ]

Neelix creations. I'm inclined to see them deleted, but they could perhaps be retargeted to mahogany (color) where an adjectival form makes some sense. They shouldn't target the article on Mahogany wood as they do currently.Plantdrew (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete first we need to establish if they are even words - Mahoganyish has less then 5000 ghits and most of the first ones are mahogany-ish Legacypac (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete after looking at several online dictionaries, it seems that the adj. form of mahogany is well... mahogany. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Why Neelix wasn't run out of town on a rail for this and multitudes of other wiki abuses (inappropriate redirects being merely the tip of the iceberg), I do not know. Softlavender (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - a Fender CD-60E All Mahogany is quite mahoganyish, but it's not mahoganier than my S&P Woodland Cedar which actually is not mahoganish at all. Because mahogany is not a valid subjective nor objective scale, it's just nonsensity. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.