Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 August 13

August 13
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 13, 2016.

Droughts in Africa

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Droughts in Africa → Environmental issues in Africa (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Droughts_in_Africa&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-07-14&end=2016-08-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Droughts_in_Africa stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Drought in Africa → Environmental issues in Africa (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drought_in_Africa&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-07-14&end=2016-08-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Drought_in_Africa stats])     [ Closure:  ]

WP:REDLINK/WP:SURPRISE. The target article has a single mention of how deforestation has created droughts in Ethiopia. There's nothing even approaching a comprehensive discussion of droughts in Africa, though such information could certainly go at the target article. --BDD (talk) 15:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:REDLINK. There are a few passing mentions in Famine in Africa but still nowhere near enough to justify retargetting, and there is no significant content specifically about Africa in the Drought article either. Thryduulf (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete to encourage article creation -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Thryduulf. shoy (reactions) 13:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

America's representative

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * America's representative → J. Christopher Stevens (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=America%27s_representative&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2016-07-14&end=2016-08-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=America's_representative stats])     [ Closure:  ]

As far as I can tell, this was a one-off reference to the target in a speech: "As America's representative, he helped the Libyan people". It wasn't even a nickname, it doesn't appear at the target, it certainly isn't a phrase that's associated primarily with the target, and it's too vague to disambiguate for the many other things to which it might refer (other diplomats, people representing the U.S. in international competition, members of the House of Representatives, etc.) 210.6.254.106 (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete yeah, way too vague for even a disambig. Thryduulf (talk) 09:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm impressed with even finding anything at all on this, but yes, there are plenty of people who could be called "America's representative" for one reason or another, so there's no primary for this at all. MSJapan (talk) 18:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are a number of potential subjects that could be called "America's representative." I could also potentially support retargetting this to United States House of Representatives, though I understand the general reluctance to to use the term "American" as a demonym for people from the United States. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete way too vague, and as mentioned hundreds if not thousands could be called that, every ambassador or diplomatic staff, even every governmental staff. Iazyges (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.