Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 10

June 10
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 10, 2016.

Some redirects starting with "Unnamed"

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Unnamed rbd album → Empezar Desde Cero (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_rbd_album&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_rbd_album stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed island off Gwadar → Zalzala Koh (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_island_off_Gwadar&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_island_off_Gwadar stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed bank → Chagos Archipelago (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_bank&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_bank stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Tower → Concord Tower (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Tower&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Tower stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed TBS Counter-Strike: Global Offensive league → ELeague (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_TBS_Counter-Strike:_Global_Offensive_league&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_TBS_Counter-Strike:_Global_Offensive_league stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Resident Evil Wii game → Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Resident_Evil_Wii_game&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Resident_Evil_Wii_game stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Quantum of Solace video game → 007: Quantum of Solace (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Quantum_of_Solace_video_game&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Quantum_of_Solace_video_game stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Party of IAC → Aam Aadmi Party (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Party_of_IAC&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Party_of_IAC stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Delete as no links needed.
 * Unnamed Enter Shikari Compilation → The Zone (album) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Enter_Shikari_Compilation&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Enter_Shikari_Compilation stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Argentinian Carcharodontosaurine → Mapusaurus (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Argentinian_Carcharodontosaurine&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Argentinian_Carcharodontosaurine stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Patagonian Carcharodontosaurine → Mapusaurus (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Patagonian_Carcharodontosaurine&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Patagonian_Carcharodontosaurine stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed 2020 Mars rover mission → Mars 2020 (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_2020_Mars_rover_mission&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_2020_Mars_rover_mission stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Unnamed Antarctican Ankylosaur → Antarctopelta (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Antarctican_Ankylosaur&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Antarctican_Ankylosaur stats])     [ Closure:  ]

List of several redirects which their targets have a name and the redirect seems to not be an alternative name for the target. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnamed TBS Counter-Strike: Global Offensive league, it was created before the name "Eleague" was unveiled and as customary procedure for these things the ad hoc original title is deleted. I'm neutral on the other ones but note that in the future the redirects could become WP:XY--Prisencolin (talk) 23:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. Check the history for each of the links to see original intent. Those albums that are now named or abandoned can be removed. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ආයුබෝවන්

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7. -- Tavix ( talk ) 01:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * ආයුබෝවන් → Greeting (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%B6%86%E0%B6%BA%E0%B7%94%E0%B6%B6%E0%B7%9D%E0%B7%80%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=ආයුබෝවන් stats])     [ Closure:  ]

A greeting in Sinhalese redirecting to Greeting. To my knowledge there's nothing particularly Sri Lankan in the general topic of greeting so I suggest deleting per WP:RFOREIGN. Uanfala (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I have absolutely no recollection of creating this, and can't imagine why I would. bd2412  T 22:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Does that mean you are okay with this being deleted per WP:G7? Steel1943  (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No objection whatsoever. I'm guessing - and this is just a guess - that it was a redlink in an article somewhere, and that I created the redirect to resolve the redlink, and then the term got unlinked (or retargeted to Wiktionary, which would be more important for a dicdef usage). bd2412  T 00:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. -- Tavix ( talk ) 01:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unnamed 1968 Raleigh Carolina League baseball team

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Unnamed 1968 Raleigh Carolina League baseball team → Durham Bulls (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_1968_Raleigh_Carolina_League_baseball_team&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_1968_Raleigh_Carolina_League_baseball_team stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Raleigh 1968 Unnamed Carolina League team → Durham Bulls (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raleigh_1968_Unnamed_Carolina_League_team&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Raleigh_1968_Unnamed_Carolina_League_team stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Per the target article, the team had a name in 1968: The Raleigh-Durham Mets. Steel1943 (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Every team and band is unnamed at some point in their existence. That this occurred in 1968 makes it an unlikely search term. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unnamed Kingdom Hearts Project

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Unnamed Kingdom Hearts Project → Kingdom Hearts (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unnamed_Kingdom_Hearts_Project&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unnamed_Kingdom_Hearts_Project stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect is ambiguous since it does not refer to what unnamed project this redirect refers to. This redirect was created as an article back in 2007, but at some point, was redirected to the series article as shown here. Disclaimer: As someone who knows a bit about the series, the series has had several "unnamed" or "untitled" projects during the last decade, probably to build buyer excitement (or disappointment) for the still unreleased Kingdom Hearts III. Steel1943 (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Given that it's a franchise now, this is vague. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unhelpful vagueness. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grand Collar

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Grand Collar → Collar (order) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grand_Collar&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-02&end=2016-05-31&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Grand_Collar stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Multiple issues - term doesn't appear in target article, nor does it appear to be actually used as a term per either the article or per Google; "Grand Cross" seems to be much more common, so I can't imagine it being a valid search term. MSJapan (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, Grand Collar is used multiple times in the article...I counted 11 times. The fact that "Grand Cross" is more common is irrelevant. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tavix. Is used in the article, and unless there's a more valid target, should stay. Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sliding doors

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 15:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Sliding doors → Sliding door (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sliding_doors&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-02&end=2016-05-31&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Sliding_doors stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Odd scenario here, so here's a discussion. Should this term refer to the plural of Sliding door or an alternative capitalization of Sliding Doors? This redirect gets about 15–20 views a day, whereas the film article Sliding Doors gets about 1000 views a day. So, most likely if a reader is looking up "sliding doors" with a lowercase "d", they are not trying to locate the film. But, then again, is there a WP:DIFFCAPS issue with the film article's title Sliding Doors? (There's a lot going on here, and it all seems to originate from the confusion presented by the nominated redirect.) Steel1943  (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. "What links here" shows the term being used for the plural and none for the film so the dab page would suffice. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Bit of a disclaimer on what you just said, Sliding doors had one link that referred to Sliding Doors ... that I corrected before I targeted the nominated redirect to its current target. Also, there currently doesn't seem to be a disambiguation page. Steel1943  (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Three items, is that enough for the dab? Other PTMs can be added at the bottom including Sliding glass door and Sliding door operator AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment from nominator: My ultimate question with this nomination is "Does a disambiguation page need to be created over the redirect because the two subjects Sliding door and Sliding Doors could be confused for one another per WP:DIFFCAPS?" Steel1943  (talk) 22:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Still WP:PLURALPT. Even if there was a disambiguation page, it would be at the "Foo (disambiguation)" title, and the lowercase plural would continue to point to the kind of door. bd2412  T 00:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trumpian

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Trumpian → Donald Trump (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trumpian&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-02&end=2016-05-31&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Trumpian stats])     [ Closure:  ]

While Trumpian exists, readers will find no information about this term at the current target, as it is not currently mentioned there. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The target neither explains the particular term nor even mentions it at all. Really, this should just be trashed. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as plausible neologism and as per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Make Wikipedia Great Again. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs to have notability on its own like Clintonian <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Searching for this exact term on Google News gets just under 7k hits including its use by The Atlantic, Fox News, The South China Morning Post, The New Yorker, The Washington Post, Maclean's, and the Economist, among others. If it's a neologism, it's one that's widely used by reliable sources. At best this helps the 44 people who searched this term in the last 11 months and at worst it's cheap and harmless. Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Patar knight. It's an adjective form, not a separate concept. It shouldn't have to be discussed at the target. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hilary with extended titles
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hilary Rodham Clinton controversies → Hillary Clinton (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hilary_Rodham_Clinton_controversies&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-02&end=2016-05-31&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Hilary_Rodham_Clinton_controversies stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Cultural matters related to Hilary Rodham Clinton → Hillary Clinton (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_matters_related_to_Hilary_Rodham_Clinton&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-02&end=2016-05-31&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Cultural_matters_related_to_Hilary_Rodham_Clinton stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The name variant and extended topic phrasing of these titles makes them improbable to occur with this misspelling during searches which leads to implausibility. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 04:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - We don't have a specific article about criticism and controversies related to Clinton that discusses different ones in the same page. There's 'Hillary Clinton e-mail controversy', 'Hillary Clinton cattle futures controversy', et cetera but no general criticism page for her. I don't think that such a page would be a particularly good idea anyways. For the other redirect, it's just too clunky, and I question whether keeping it is helpful at all. I do want to note that if some better worded redirect such as 'Cultural depictions of Hillary Clinton' or something like that comes along, then we could just go to 'Hillary_Clinton'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't make it clear before, but all that along with the misspelling of "Hillary" as "Hilary", is the reason I nominated these. I've amended above. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 07:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep we did have Hillary Rodham Clinton controversies and Cultural matters related to Hillary Rodham Clinton for some time.  Neither redirect is new or harmful.  Nothing to be gained and a little to loose by deleting them.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 06:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC).


 * Delete This would set a precedent for "Cultural matters related to (person)" of which only Hillary Clinton has a link for. As for controversies, the existing format of "(person) (type of contoversy) controversy" seems to work fine. It doesn't need a generic page of controversies unless there's a fully developed article listing them. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirects don't set precedent. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC).


 * Yes and no. Precedents don't have a formal role in most of the project (though note that WP:RFDO could easily be added to that page). But almost anything can start a precedent. For this, or anything, to start one, an editor would only need to cite it in a related argument. So it's not true that if we do X, we're automatically setting a precedent, but neither is it true that we can do X and insist that it never will be one. That said, I did just assert the latter the other day. --BDD (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Isab
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Isab → Internet slang (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isab&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Isab stats])     [ Closure:  ]

I think this redirect should be deleted. It replaced an article trying coin or popularize the abbreviation "isab" to mean "I smiled a bit." I can find no evidence on Google that anyone actually uses this abbreviation. The initial article should have been deleted. People may be searching Wikipedia for "ISAB" due to recent news articles about the International Security Advisory Board and confusingly winding up at "Internet slang." That's how I found it. -driver8 (talk) 19:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Isab is not mentioned at the target. We have an article about one thing whose lede says it's called ISAB (Ionospheric absorption), but ISAB is red and doesn't redirect there (and personally I don't think it should, roughly per WP:ONEBLUELINKDAB). Search results are the best thing we can offer readers at this point until we get more articles created. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete unless someone wants to update United States Department of State to include the mention of this board. Even then it would be the caps version. No notable people named Isab at the moment. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bouncy kastle
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Bouncy kastle → Inflatable (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bouncy_kastle&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bouncy_kastle stats])     [ Closure:  ]

I don't think I've ever known anyone to spell "Castle" as "Kastle", I appreciate some may not be able to spell but the moment you search "Bouncy" - "Bouncy castle" then appears, And I'd imagine most people in the world would (or atleast should) know how to spell "Castle", so all in all I fail to see how this is of any use, As always I'm always happy to withdraw, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not a notable brand of Bounce house. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The greatest american superhero
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The greatest american superhero → The Greatest American Hero (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_greatest_american_superhero&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-03&end=2016-06-01&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_greatest_american_superhero stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The redirect doesn't seem to be an alternate or likely make for the target article. (If search engines return a connection between the redirect and the target article, it is most likely because of Wikipedia mirrors saving the connection since the redirect has existed since 2004.) Steel1943  (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This seems like a plausible typo. -- Beland (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The most Baptist state in the world
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The most Baptist state in the world → Nagaland (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_most_Baptist_state_in_the_world&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-03&end=2016-06-01&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_most_Baptist_state_in_the_world stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Per the redirect's target article, it seems that the target subject has been known as "...the only predominantly Baptist state in the world..." as cited by a reference, but I'm not sure if that warrants the nominated WP:NPOV-violating redirect (unless this is an official term for the target article's subject.) Steel1943  (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This doesn't seem like a POV redirect; it concerns a objective demographic attribute, which is correct and referenced. -- Beland (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless repeatedly sourced, I object to any redirect using "the most X in the world" or "the most X ever". Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly defined and referenced in the article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: is "most baptist" necessarily the same as "highest proportion of baptists"? I'm not sure that that's at all obvious, and if we are going by absolute population then Texas has approximately ten times as many Baptists as Nagaland.  I'm also not at all sure that someone looking for the most baptist state in the world would obviously be interested in subnational states rather than nation-states.  For both of these reasons, the redirect is potentially confusing.  It's not POV, but nor is it helpful. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 11:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep is used by reliables sources to refer to Nagaland and not just in the "it's pretty Baptist" sense but as an alternative name (see:, , ). Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Patar knight. Reliably sourced, even if it is subjective. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reich Ministry of Economics
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Reich Ministry of Economics → Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reich_Ministry_of_Economics&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-03&end=2016-06-01&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Reich_Ministry_of_Economics stats])     [ Closure:  ]

In Special:Diff/723132940, blanked the redirect with the edit summary Redirect not useful, and the user later moved the redirect to the draft namespace. We don't blank inappropriate redirects or move them to another namespace, so I reverted these actions. However, if the allegation that the redirect isn't useful is correct, then the redirect should be retargeted or deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Generally, the word Reich means empire, but generally refers to Nazi office, as they put the word Reich on everything. Although, reich can refer to earlier German empire that came before World War 1. Perhaps a target at List of German economics ministers, which includes both German Empire and Nazi entries? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The modern office seems to claim direct lineage from all previous German ministries, so the redirect does make sense. Maybe retarget to Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy as the only relevant section? Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The history section, pertaining to Reichswirtschaftsministerium contains only: "The historical predecessor of the current Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy was the Reichswirtschaftsamt (Reich Economic Office), founded in 1917. In 1919, this became the Reichswirtschaftsministerium (Reich Ministry of Economy), which existed until 1945." The de.wiki article option is superior in this regard (please see my comment below). K.e.coffman (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment The user who made this redirect also made Reich Ministry of Finance, Reich Foreign Ministry, Reich Interior Ministry, Reich Labour Ministry all redirect to their modern-day equivalents, which have varying degrees of information on their history under the Nazis, and should be discussed here as well. Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: the reason that I made the edit that lead to this discussion was that I was trying to use the template, to direct the readers to Reichswirtschaftsministerium on the German wiki, and instead was getting a redirect to the subsequent, 1949+, agency on the English wiki. I think it would be more helpful to readers to see the de.wiki article (one can always use Google translate), vs the current solution. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * We don't redirect users to other language editions of Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * My suggestion is to delete the existing redirect (i.e. no article by this name), so that the inter-language template can be used as needed, and encourage editors to create an article. Same suggestion applies to the Reich Economics Ministry. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Stefan, yes we do, using illm, where this Wikipedia has no article on a subject, but another language Wikipedia does. Deryck C. 16:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - de:Reichswirtschaftsministerium has no sources, or I'd have attempted to translate a little of the text in some manner, and add it along with the source to the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy article. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 04:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep but encourage article creation. Since "Reichswirtschaftsministerium (Reich Ministry of Economy)" is discussed in the target article, it's useful to have the redirect. An interwiki link can still be used in articles by direct link inclusion (de:Reichswirtschaftsministerium) if we want to do so in particular articles. Deryck C. 16:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Teachings
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to School of thought. --BDD (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Teachings → Teacher (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teachings&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-03&end=2016-06-01&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Teachings stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Would it make more sense for this to target knowledge? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Teachings are generally religious or philosophical, so perhaps School of thought? Abductive  (reasoning) 03:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak retarget to Education since Teaching redirects there. Otherwise, delete as vague and ambiguous. Steel1943  (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to school of thought per Abductive. Probably a better target since teachings in the plural usually refers to the collected lessons of some figure. This gets 121 views over the last 90 days, so it does see use. If "school of thought" isn't good enough, soft redirect to Wiktionary. Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to school of thought per Abductive as this is probably the only meaning people would be looking for. Uanfala (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to school of thought per the above. bd2412  T 00:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oz rock
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was keep. Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Oz rock → Australian rock (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oz_rock&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-11&end=2016-06-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Oz_rock stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Implausible redirect.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   10:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The redirect is mentioned in the first sentence of the article as a bolded alternative term, and the article hasn't been edited in about two weeks. Steel1943  (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as useful short name used in news articles and books .   There is a festival in 2016 went under that name in Busselton but it was canceled for 2016. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I created the redirect because 'Oz rock' was a term used by friends in Australia but which I could not find on Wikipedia. To me it makes sense to include a term that is used commonly but which is already described under another page. Richard Stephens (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.