Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 3

June 3
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 3, 2016.

Good sleep in bedroom

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Good sleep in bedroom → Sleep (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Good_sleep_in_bedroom&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Good_sleep_in_bedroom stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Redirect seems somewhat misleading since the redirect is not the topic of the target article and WP:NOTHOWTO. Steel1943 (talk) 22:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not a Wikipedia-notable phrase. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - highly amusing nonnotable redirect that deserves deletion. Also per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as confusing -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a guide to how to best live your life. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Good sex

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Good sex → Human sexuality (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Good_sex&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Good_sex stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Besides the fact that "good sex" isn't defined in the target article, sex isn't exclusive to humans. Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ruth Westheimer She had a cable show in the 1980s called Good Sex! basically when talk shows about such subjects were becoming popular.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as plausible article/dab. It seems that an article about the talk show can be created in the future -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This might be okay to delete for now. The redirect called Good Sex! should be created when someone bothers to put that show in the Dr. Ruth article or make its own show. That it wasn't directed to Dr. Ruth in the first place means the editor did not have that in mind. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Good hand

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Good hand → Goodhand (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Good_hand&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Good_hand stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Since the redirect's target is a surname list page, this redirect seems like an unlikely typo that is misleading since it is two words. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. Oh, just found out that it's a "Neelix redirect". (See WP:G6). Steel1943  (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a dictionary and it's a list of common words. Someone search for good hands would get distracted by this. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as R from alternative spacing (Good Hands (disambiguation) is listed there). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 17:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad sex in literature

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Bad sex in literature → Literary Review (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_sex_in_literature&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bad_sex_in_literature stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Without the word "award", this redirect seems misleading. This redirect sounds like it would redirect to a lost article about its subject, but even then, such an article would probably never be created. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete implausible search term or redirect term. Someone typing in bad sex will see the award show up as a possibility. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - autocomplete works fine here. shoy (reactions) 16:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad for children

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Bad for children → Think of the children (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_for_children&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bad_for_children stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The redirect and its target don't seem related. Since the target is a phrase, using a possibly unused, uncited, not-so-synonomous phrase could be seen as misleading. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete vague term. Notice Good For You has a dab page because there are songs and shows named as such. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with nom, and with Angus' point about the difference with Good for You. Rlendog (talk) 15:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague. shoy (reactions) 16:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad energy
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 12%23Bad energy

Bad faith (existentialism

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete, as there's consensus to do so. To answer my own comment, I just conducted a fairly through page view analysis, and this particular redirect should be safe to delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Bad faith (existentialism → Bad faith (existentialism) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_faith_(existentialism&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bad_faith_(existentialism stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Unlikely typo due to missing bracket on the right side. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Sending this to CSD. R3 AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It doesn't qualify for WP:R3 as it wasn't recently created. Even if it was, I'd be wary deleting it via CSD as this type of typo has been kept in the past, usually because of high traffic. Certain websites sometimes leave off the closing parenthesis when externally linked. You can check out Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 March 29 for more info. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It got rejected from CSD. So I am picking Almost speedy delete. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Implausible. No more affinity for a missing ")" than any other disambiguated title which makes it WP:COSTLY. — Godsy (TALK<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;"> CONT ) 17:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Second largest economy
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Second largest economy → List of countries by GDP (nominal) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_largest_economy&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Second_largest_economy stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Second-largest economy → List of countries by GDP (nominal) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second-largest_economy&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Second-largest_economy stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Since these redirects include the word "second", they both seem ambiguous to a point where they should probably be deleted so that Wikipedia's search engine can provide more help for our readers than being redirected to these redirects' current target. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague. shoy (reactions) 16:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Trillion dollar club
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 12%23The Trillion dollar club

Strongest economies
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Strongest economies → List of countries by GDP (nominal) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strongest_economies&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Strongest_economies stats])     [ Closure:  ]

In the redirect's context, "economies" seems ambiguous to a point where the redirect should target a different article or be deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unpopular pop songs
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Unpopular pop songs → List of music considered the worst (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unpopular_pop_songs&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unpopular_pop_songs stats])     [ Closure:  ]

"Unpopular" ≠ "Worst". (Also, the phrase "unpopular pop" is an oxymoron in itself.) Steel1943  (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, since "unpopular" suggests opinion, and per above... — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 20:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. A song can be horrible but very popular. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as vague -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Worst tornados
Relisted, see Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 13%23Worst tornados

Worst baseball teams of all time
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. Despite the lack of promotion and relegation in North American sports, it's unlikely any of the "worst" teams "of all time" would really be in MLB. --BDD (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Worst baseball teams of all time → List of worst Major League Baseball season records (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_baseball_teams_of_all_time&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_baseball_teams_of_all_time stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Baseball teams aren't exclusive to Major League Baseball. Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Do we have a list of worst baseball teams in other countries or other leagues? Given the popularity of baseball in the US and Canada compared to other English speaking nations I suspect that most people typing this in are thinking about Major League Baseball.  But if we have other "worst baseball team lists" this page should dab to those. Rlendog (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete given the ambiguity. There are a lot of baseball leagues. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Worst president
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Worst president → Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_president&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_president stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst president ever → Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_president_ever&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_president_ever stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst presidents → Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_presidents&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_presidents stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Presidents are not exclusive to the United States. Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There doesn't seem to be a decent target. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 20:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I created this one, for reasons that no doubt made sense at the time, but I agree now it's too unspecific for a redirect. Delete. Robofish (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete too vague and also not specific to the US. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to List of video games notable for negative reception
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Bad games → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_games&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bad_games stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Crappy game → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crappy_game&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Crappy_game stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Crappy games → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crappy_games&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Crappy_games stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Games considered the worst ever → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Games_considered_the_worst_ever&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Games_considered_the_worst_ever stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * List of games considered the worst ever → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_games_considered_the_worst_ever&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=List_of_games_considered_the_worst_ever stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * List of games known for negative reception → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_games_known_for_negative_reception&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=List_of_games_known_for_negative_reception stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * List of games notable for negative reception → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_games_notable_for_negative_reception&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=List_of_games_notable_for_negative_reception stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst game → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_game&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_game stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst game ever → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_game_ever&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_game_ever stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst games → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_games&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_games stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Worst games ever → List of video games notable for negative reception (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worst_games_ever&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Worst_games_ever stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Similar to Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 2 – The word "game" is ambiguous and may refer to board games and sports. Steel1943 (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Not sure about the "List of" redirects, if there's some other potential. But Delete as ambiguous for the others. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 20:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all Keep only the basic ones List of worst video games not creative ways to phrase that. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep all. These seem harmless to me.  Yes, "game" has multiple meanings, but currently there isn't a list of "Worst board games ever", so it's a redlink or a possibly-relevant link.  Disambiguation can be created if such a list ever comes up.  SnowFire (talk) 01:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Could refer to sports games though. It's better if it goes to the general search results. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, but there isn't a List of worst sports games article either to find via search! Even if the video games list is right only 40% of the time (to make up a number), the search won't have anything good the other 60% of the time, so why not be direct.  Incidentally, searching Google for "list of worst sports games" mostly seems to refer to the above video game topic - really bad sports video games, not specific games-of-sports that are really bad, e.g. Bears 73 - Redskins 0 or whatever.    The top 3 hits aren't Wikipedia either, so it's not like this is self-contamination poison.  SnowFire (talk) 01:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. None of them are useful.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Sure they are. They're mostly synonyms are variations of the title.  Some of them I can see being a stretch ("Crappy games") but what's the harm?  Redirects are cheap, only actively harmful redirects are bad.  SnowFire (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Recent history
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Recent history → Contemporary history (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recent_history&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Recent_history stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect seems ambiguous, but I'm not sure if a disambiguation page is useful in this case. For one, the current target doesn't seem to use the phrase "recent history" as a recognized alternative name. Also, in web browsers, "recent history" could refer to recently-viewed web pages. And, there's the matter of Special:PrefixIndex/Recent history. Steel1943 (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete vague search term, also common enough to be overlinked. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mammals discovered in the 2000s
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Steel1943  (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Mammals discovered in the 2000s → Mammals described in the 2000s (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mammals_discovered_in_the_2000s&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Mammals_discovered_in_the_2000s stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The redirect could be seen as misleading since a new species of organism isn't necessarily official described when it is discovered. Steel1943 (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Disagree: This seems close enough that the casual browser might not know the difference. Better that they find something (likely what they are looking for) than nothing due to a discrepancy of terminology. -Drdisque (talk) 22:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously useful as a redirect - David Gerard (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, the list does a good job of covering both. I did a little bit of searching but couldn't find any mammals discovered in a different decade but described in the 2000s. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mammal discoveries
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Mammal discoveries → Mammals described in the 2000s (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mammal_discoveries&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Mammal_discoveries stats])     [ Closure:  ]

"Discoveries" aren't exclusive to the 2000s. Steel1943 (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Is there even a list of newly discovered animals of any kind being maintained on Wikipedia? <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There is a series of some decent (but probably still incomplete) lists of recently discovered extinct species, e.g. 2015 in paleontology. There are few half-assed lists for recently described extant species, but nothing of decent quality.


 * Dellete No appropriate target. Plantdrew (talk) 03:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New mammals
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * New mammals → Mammals described in the 2000s (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_mammals&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=New_mammals stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The word "New" seems ambiguous in this redirect. Newly discovered, newly born individual mammals, etc? Steel1943  (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and recentism. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete misleading target, no appropriate target. Plantdrew (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unhelpful vagueness. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Recently discovered mammals
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Recently discovered mammals → Mammals described in the 2000s (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recently_discovered_mammals&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Recently_discovered_mammals stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect seems outdated and will require time-specific maintenance as new articles are created. Also, "discovered" and "described" do not necessarily mean the same since a new species can be discovered before it is described. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete It's the 2010s already. There should be a list of mammals described in the 2010s. Oh wait, that doesn't exist. What's the point of such a list then? <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete what does recent mean? Doesn't make any sense if we have lists broken down by decade. Should this have been retargeted on Jan 1 2010 (or 2011) to an empty list for the 2010s? 10 years might be considered recent (stretching back to 2006 right now), or 5 years, or 25 years. Even if a set amount of time is defined, recent will have a rolling cutoff date that doesn't mesh well with decade based lists. Plantdrew (talk) 03:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latest stable software release templates/Google Photos
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * <span id="Latest stable software release templates/Google Photos">Latest stable software release templates/Google Photos → Template:Latest stable software release templates/Google Photos (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latest_stable_software_release_templates/Google_Photos&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Latest_stable_software_release_templates/Google_Photos stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Seems as though this WP:XNR was probably created in error. Doesn't seem like a likely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Implausible. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latest bbc three shows
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Latest bbc three shows → Together (UK TV series) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latest_bbc_three_shows&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Latest_bbc_three_shows stats])     [ Closure:  ]

The connection between the redirect and the target is unclear, considering that the target is only one TV series. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * As the person who created the redirect simply by moving a badly labeled article, I'd be fine with the deletion. It's not a term that anyone is likely to search for, and even if it were, time destroys the accuracy of the result. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a TV guide. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HTcpcp
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete those that haven't already been speedy deleted. The only permutations that will remain is HTCPCP and Htcpcp. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 16:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * HTcPcP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HTcPcP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HTcPcP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcPcP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcPcP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcPcP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtCpcP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtCpcP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtCpcP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcpcP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcpcP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcpcP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcpCP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcpCP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcpCP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcpCp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcpCp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcpCp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcPCP → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcPCP&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcPCP stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcPCp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcPCp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcPCp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtcPcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtcPcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtcPcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtCPCp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtCPCp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtCPCp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtCPcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtCPcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtCPcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HtCpcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HtCpcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HtCpcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HTCPCp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HTCPCp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HTCPCp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HTCPcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HTCPcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HTCPcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HTCpcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HTCpcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HTCpcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * HTcpcp → Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HTcpcp&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=HTcpcp stats])     [ Closure:  ]

A number of these are just permutations of capitalization that seem like they will never be hit. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 18:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * NOTE. The editor has essentially requested deletion with Special:Diff/723574693. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 21:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all Unlikely stylizations that clutter up searches. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth, I'm reaching out about a number of CSD G7 cases pending as of now (ones that might be a bit roundabout), and wondered if you'd be able to handle this one. Looking into Special:Contributions/Finnh54, the user created 20 redirects to Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol, ~16 of which I RfD here. The user later did this, which I interpreted as a user request for deletion, so I tagged the redirects with G7. Let me know if there's anything in this process I missed, if deletions are questionable, or if I mislabeled anything. Thanks. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 21:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There should be 32 permutations. I have just wasted 15 minutes working out which ones has missed - the red links in this list:
 * HTCPCP HTCPCp HTCPcP HTCPcp HTCpCP HTCpCp HTCpcP HTCpcp
 * HTcPCP HTcPCp HTcPcP HTcPcp HTcpCP HTcpCp HTcpcP HTcpcp
 * HtCPCP HtCPCp HtCPcP HtCPcp HtCpCP HtCpCp HtCpcP HtCpcp
 * HtcPCP HtcPCp HtcPcP HtcPcp HtcpCP HtcpCp HtcpcP Htcpcp
 * I have a good mind to create them myself. Redirects are cheap and somehow the silliness of these seems totally appropriate for the tone of the target article. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahh... all right, haha, understood. I'll retract my G7 tags and restore the redirects. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 23:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There was a recent G7 conflict. The redirects listed above (except possibly HTCPCP and Htcpcp) should either be deleted, or all created. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 23:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Is there a point to having any of these except HTCPCP and Htcpcp? Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Personally I don't see it. At the current RfD for these, another user did chime in as well. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 23:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * We shouldn't be introducing our own editorial jokes on the subject. WP:NPOVTITLE <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all - I appreciate 's suggestion that they should be all created instead so as to perpetuate the joke, but since the search engine is case insensitive and it's very unlikely any of these would be used as links except themselves as jokes (and probably not in article space) they can safely be deleted. Or not; redirects are WP:CHEAP. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)
 * The stylization permutations aren't even discussed in the article, so I don't see how the variants would be relevant. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Black orange
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete, including the variants listed below. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Black orange → Brown (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_orange&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Black_orange stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Another Neelix color redirect i'm not sure. Brown is made from red yellow and black. I get why this redirect was made cause red and yellow make orange. But, I don't see orange alongside black in the article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find no sources which clearly use "black orange" to mean this. (There's talking about "black-orange" hair, but it's far from clear that author actually means brown, as opposed to some funny shade of red hair). Most commonly they mean "black and orange" (e.g. stripes) or it's just mis-hits of the form "black, orange, blue, red, whatever color, etc.". (FWIW, first thing I thought of was orange (fruit) which has been blackened/burnt in a pan or the oven, but I guess no one uses it to mean that either.) Search results are better than any specific target. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 13:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete no such name for a color or a kind of fruit. Orange and black is common. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Of course there are several variants of this. If this term gets deleted, the variants should go as well. I have them listed below:


 * Black oranges
 * Black-orange
 * Black-oranges
 * Blackish oranges
 * Blackish-oranges
 * Blackorange
 * Blackoranges
 * Orange black
 * Orange blacks
 * Orange-black
 * Orange-blacks
 * Orangeblack
 * Orangeblacks
 * Orangeish blacks
 * Orangeish-blacks
 * Orangeishblack
 * Orangish black
 * Orangish blacks
 * Orangish-black
 * Orangish-blacks


 * -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all - I fail to see how any of this garbage is helpful. Past precedent is clear for these kinds of Neelix-created redirects. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all WP:G6 - we've been down this road with Neelix's unusual colour constructs before. Established consensus is that if they aren't a match for an established colour which we have an actual description of (like blue-green or seal brown) then they get deleted. No need for more discussion here. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Also I preemptively oppose retargeting any of these to Orange Is the New Black. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marilyn Manson discography
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was move over redirect. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Marilyn Manson discography → Marilyn Manson (band) discography (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marilyn_Manson_discography&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Marilyn_Manson_discography stats])     [ Closure:  ]

Should this be retargeted to Marilyn Manson? The current target is a discography of the band, whose article is located at Marilyn Manson (band). If consensus is found to keep the current target, an RM request should be started to move the article over this redirect to remove unnecessary disambiguation. SST flyer  01:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate due to the lead singer and the band having the same name. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * , your suggestion makes sense in the general case, but not here. There's nothing to disambiguate between: everything mentioned at Marilyn Manson is already covered, in greater detail, at Marilyn Manson (band) discography, including what appear to be the solo appearances of the lead singer on other people's songs. I'd second 's suggestion to move the article over the redirect. Uanfala (talk) 14:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Make "Marilyn Mansion discography" the article name, as with Bruce Springsteen discography and Prince albums discography. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Light Goldenrods
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Goldenrod (color). -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Light Goldenrods → Flax (color) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Light_Goldenrods&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Light_Goldenrods stats])     [ Closure:  ]
 * Light goldenrod → Flax (color) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Light_Goldenrods&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Light_Goldenrods stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This redirect should be retargeted to Goldenrod_(color) because flax is not light goldenrod. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. No mention of light goldenrod color in flax article. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - i just found another light goldenrod redirect to flax, and added it to the nomination. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Golden white
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Golden white → Flax (color) (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Golden_white&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Golden_white stats])     [ Closure:  ]

This Neelix redirect i'm not sure. The flax article says its a yellowish-grey color, but flax can be found in the Shades_of_white article. Which one is right? MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not mentioned at target, which means our attempt to match colors would be original research. <strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:WARALERT
<div class="boilerplate rfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was retarget to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * WARALERT → Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WARALERT&action=history history] · [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-04&end=2016-06-02&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikipedia:WARALERT stats])     [ Closure:  ]

All but orphaned redirect to WP:AN/I, unlikely to be used in the future. — xaosflux  Talk 00:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. The shortcut seems like a good search term for the place to report edit wars, and considering that WP:WAR redirects to Edit warring, this seems to make sense. Steel1943  (talk) 20:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to 3RR noticebroad simply. KGirlTrucker87talk what I'm been doing 23:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring per Steel -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak retarget to Template:uw-3rr, the alert template about edit warring. The suggestions above are probably better. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, the template requires substitution and a redirect would be broken. Retarget per above. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.